Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2024 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (3) TMI 1177 - AT - Service Tax


Issues involved:
The issues involved in the judgment are:
1. Whether the Commissioner erred in dropping the demand of Rs.87,25,472/- by not following Circular No. 96/7/2007 - ST dated 23.08.2007.
2. Whether the Commissioner erred in dropping the demand of Rs.6,28,306/- in respect of taxable services of Installation of CNG Kits provided to customers, since sales tax/VAT remained paid on the same.
3. Whether the Commissioner erred in extending the benefit of cum-tax benefit to the assessee, resulting in dropping of demand of Rs.42,985/-.

Summary:
The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Original passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Surat. The case involved M/s. J.K. Motors, engaged in providing services as an 'Authorised Service Station' for Motor Vehicle servicing and repairing. The audit revealed that the company did not include the value of consumables used in servicing vehicles and free service commission in the taxable value, resulting in a short payment of service tax. The Commissioner confirmed a demand of Rs.3,99,413/- along with interest and penalty, while dropping a demand of Rs.93,96,763/- as per the show cause notice.

The Revenue contended that the Commissioner erred in not following Circular No. 96/7/2007 - ST dated 23.08.2007 and in extending the benefit of cum-tax to the assessee. The issue of includability of the cost of spares in the gross taxable value was in contradiction with previous Circulars. The Tribunal observed the need for factual verification regarding separate bills for spare parts and payment of sales tax/VAT before concluding on dropping the demand. The absence of separate invoices for CNG kit installations led to the decision that payment of VAT does not exempt the company from service tax liability.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision considering the issues raised in the show cause notice and submissions from both sides. The appeal was allowed for reconsideration of the issues in light of the discussions, and the case was disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates