Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2024 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (4) TMI 955 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues involved:
The issues involved in the judgment are delay condonation application, reassessment u/s 29(4) of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, classification of Nylon Chips under Entry 83 of Schedule II(B) of the Act, and tax liability determination.

Delay Condonation Application:
The judgment addressed a delay of 164 days in filing the Revision, which was condoned based on reasons stated in the application seeking condonation of delay. The Delay Condonation Application was allowed.

Reassessment u/s 29(4) of the Act:
The State filed a Revision against the order passed by the Commercial Tax Tribunal, where the dispute revolved around the tax amount for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The Assessing Officer had assessed the total tax on self-manufactured Nylon Chips, and the Tribunal examined whether reassessment u/s 29(4) could be made on a change of opinion. The respondent argued that the reassessment was a clear change of opinion and not u/s 29(1)(c) of the Act.

Classification of Nylon Chips:
The Tribunal analyzed whether Nylon Chips manufactured by the appellant fell under Entry 83 of Schedule II(B) of the Act, which pertains to "Plastic granules, plastic powder, and master batches." The respondent contended that the Nylon Chips were indeed plastic granules based on the manufacturing process and technical characteristics. The Tribunal referred to various definitions of "Plastics" and "Granules" to determine the classification.

Tax Liability Determination:
After detailed examination, the Tribunal concluded that Nylon Chips should be classified under Entry 83 of Schedule II(B) of the Act, and the taxable liability could not be 13.5%. The judgment highlighted that the manufacturing process did not alter the character of Nylon Chips as a plastic product. The appellant-department accepted that the strength of plastic granules improved when additives were included, supporting the classification of Nylon Chips as plastics.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the Revision as there was no substantial question of law to be considered. The judgment affirmed that Nylon Chips fell under Entry 83 of Schedule II(B) of the Act. The decision was based on the technical characteristics and manufacturing process of Nylon Chips, supporting their classification as plastic granules.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates