Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2024 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (6) TMI 51 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
1. Rejection of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority.
2. Submission of required documents by the Resolution Professional (RP).
3. Compliance of the Resolution Plan with Section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

Summary:

Issue 1: Rejection of the Resolution Plan
The appeals were filed against the order of the Adjudicating Authority dated 05.04.2024, which rejected the I.A. No. 1394/2023 filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) for approval of the Resolution Plan submitted by M/s. Eagle Fashions Private Ltd. The Adjudicating Authority observed that the RP did not submit necessary documents such as the Information Memorandum, RFRP, Valuation Report, receipt of Performance Security, and Minutes of the 8th Meeting of the CoC. Additionally, it noted that the claim of Statutory Authorities was not accepted by the RP, and the liquidation option was considered better.

Issue 2: Submission of Required Documents by RP
The Adjudicating Authority pointed out that the RP failed to submit critical documents, including the RFRP, Information Memorandum, and Valuation Reports. It was also noted that the RP did not provide the Minutes of the 8th CoC Meeting and the receipt of performance security. The Tribunal emphasized that the Adjudicating Authority could have directed the RP to submit these documents instead of rejecting the plan outright.

Issue 3: Compliance with Section 30(2) of IBC
The Tribunal discussed the limited jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority to review the commercial wisdom of the CoC, as established in the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in `Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited vs Satish Kumar Gupta and Ors.` and `Maharashtra Seamless Steel Ltd vs. Padmanabhan Venkatesh & Others`. The Tribunal found that the Adjudicating Authority's observations regarding non-compliance with Section 30(2) were merely bare observations without any substantive basis or material. The Tribunal reiterated that the Adjudicating Authority could reject a Resolution Plan only if it did not comply with Section 30(2) of the Code.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order dated 05.04.2024, and revived I.A. No. 1394/2023 for fresh consideration by the Adjudicating Authority. The RP was directed to submit the necessary documents and Minutes within two weeks for the Adjudicating Authority to reconsider the application in accordance with the law.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates