2009 (5) TMI 287 - AT - Service Tax

Demand of Service Tax under the category of Advertisement Agencies Services. The learned Advocate stated that the appellant is actually undertaking the activity of screen painting (sic) (printing) based on the orders from various clients including the Government agencies Issue involved stated as identical to that of Zodiac Advertisers v. CCE, Cochin., wherein matter remanded to original authority by SC case is remanded - all the records and other factual positions have to be thoroughly examined by the Original Authority in order to come to a definite conclusion on the issue.

Summary

Issues:
Demand of Service Tax under Advertisement Agencies Services category, interpretation of relevant legal provisions, examination of records for conclusive determination.

Analysis:
The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore involved the demand of Service Tax under the category of Advertisement Agencies Services. The appellant argued that they were engaged in screen painting based on client orders, including government agencies. Reference was made to a previous Final Order by the Tribunal, which was later set aside by the High Court and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court highlighted the importance of determining whether the appellant falls under the definition of an 'advertising agency' as per the Finance Act, 1994. However, the Court noted the absence of crucial documents like orders, purchase materials, and books of accounts before the Tribunal. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the orders of the High Court and the Tribunal, directing the appellant to produce all relevant records to ascertain the nature of their work. The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for a detailed examination to determine if the appellant is involved in conceptualizing and creating advertisements or merely following client instructions.

The issue in question being identical to a previous case, the appellant requested a remand to the Original Authority for a thorough examination of all records. The Tribunal, after considering the arguments, concluded that a comprehensive review of all records and factual positions was necessary for a definitive decision. The appellant assured the production of all records before the adjudicating authority as per the Supreme Court's directions. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the original authority to issue a fresh order within four months, following the Supreme Court's guidelines. The stay application and appeal were disposed of accordingly, with all issues left open for further consideration.

In summary, the judgment emphasized the importance of presenting all relevant documents for a thorough examination to determine the appellant's status as an advertising agency. The decision highlighted the need for a detailed review of records to establish the nature of the appellant's work and whether it aligns with the definition of an advertising agency under the relevant legal provisions. The matter was remitted to the Original Authority for a fresh decision based on a comprehensive analysis of all records, in line with the directives of the Supreme Court.