Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2024 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (6) TMI 794 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Denial of exemption claimed u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Non-charging of interest on advance paid for the purchase of property.
3. Validity of the impugned order in law and facts.

Summary:

Issue 1: Denial of exemption claimed u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
The assessee, a charitable institution registered u/s 12A and 80G, filed a return of income for AY 2016-17 declaring NIL income after claiming exemption u/s 11. The Ld. Assessing Officer assessed the total income at Rs. 2,36,88,981/- by denying the exemption claimed u/s 11 and made an addition of Rs. 1,82,62,151/-. The Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) confirmed this addition. The Tribunal observed that the advances for land purchase were accepted in earlier years and subsequent years, and the Ld. CIT(E), Bhopal, had dropped proceedings for withdrawal of registration u/s 12AA, treating the transactions as genuine. Hence, the Tribunal concluded that the denial of exemption u/s 11 was not justified.

Issue 2: Non-charging of interest on advance paid for the purchase of property
The Ld. Assessing Officer added Rs. 45,26,830/- as notional interest on the outstanding advance paid to a specified person u/s 13(3) for the purchase of land, considering it a violation of section 13(1)(c) r.w.s. 13(2)(a). The Tribunal noted that the transaction was commercial in nature, and the Ld. CIT(E), Bhopal, had accepted it as genuine, dropping the proceedings for withdrawal of registration u/s 12AA. The Tribunal held that the calculation of notional interest and its addition to the income was unjustified and directed the AO to vacate this addition.

Issue 3: Validity of the impugned order in law and facts
The Tribunal found that the observations of the Ld. CIT(A) and the findings of the Ld. AO were not sustainable. The advances for land purchase were genuine business transactions, and the denial of exemption u/s 11 based on notional interest was incorrect. The Tribunal set aside the findings of the Ld. CIT(A) and allowed the appeal of the assessee.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to vacate the additions made and uphold the exemption claimed u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The order was pronounced in the open court on 02/01/2024.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates