Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2024 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (6) TMI 1047 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
Application for approval of Trust under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act; Rejection of application by CIT(E) based on religious expenses exceeding 5% of total receipts; Appeal against CIT(E) order.

Analysis:
1. The appeal was filed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) rejecting the application for approval of Trust under Section 80G(5) of the Act due to religious expenses exceeding 5% of total receipts.

2. The CIT(E) dismissed the application citing that the trust's activities were religious in nature, contravening the provisions of Section 80G, which require funds to be applied only for charitable purposes. The rejection was based on the trust's own declaration of incurring religious expenses exceeding 5% of total receipts.

3. The Hon'ble Supreme Court precedent in Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd vs CIT clarified that a charitable purpose does not include activities of substantially religious nature. The judgment emphasized that even if a trust has multiple charitable objects, if one is substantially religious, it falls outside Section 80G's scope.

4. Referring to the Nilackal St. Thomas Church case, the ITAT upheld rejection of approval under Section 80G where no charitable activities were conducted, and more than 5% of income was spent on religious purposes.

5. During the appeal, the assessee contended that no religious expenses were incurred, attributing the mention of such expenses in the application to inadvertence. The assessee argued that the trust's objects were not religious and challenged the summary rejection without a fair opportunity to explain.

6. The Tribunal observed that the CIT(E) did not seek specific details in the show-cause notice regarding religious expenses. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration to ascertain if less than 5% of total income was spent on religious activities, with the possibility of granting Section 80G(5) benefits if conditions were met.

7. Consequently, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remitted to the CIT(E) for a de novo examination based on the Tribunal's observations.

This summary provides a detailed analysis of the legal judgment involving the rejection of a trust's application under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act due to religious expenses exceeding the permissible limit, leading to an appeal and subsequent remand for fresh consideration.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates