Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2024 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (6) TMI 1284 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment
2. Non-grant of Working Capital Adjustment
3. Exclusion of Certain Comparables
4. Inclusion of Certain Comparables
5. Corporate Tax Issues

Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment:
The assessee, a subsidiary of Intuit Inc., engaged in software development services, had its international transactions scrutinized for arm's length pricing. The Ld.TPO, dissatisfied with the assessee's comparables, conducted a fresh search and proposed a transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 81,27,50,580/-. The Ld.AO made a draft assessment order, proposing a disallowance under Section 10AA. The DRP accepted some comparables and rejected others, leading to a final TP adjustment of Rs. 70,88,21,288/-.

2. Non-grant of Working Capital Adjustment:
The assessee argued for a working capital adjustment, citing Rule 10B(3) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, which allows adjustments for economic differences. The Tribunal, referencing previous decisions, concluded that negative working capital adjustment should not be made for a captive service provider like the assessee, as it does not bear working capital risks. The Tribunal directed the Ld.AO to exclude negative working capital adjustment.

3. Exclusion of Certain Comparables:
The assessee sought the exclusion of several comparables, arguing functional dissimilarity:
- Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd.: Excluded due to diversified activities, ownership of intangibles, and lack of segmental details.
- Infosys Ltd.: Excluded for diverse services, significant R&D, brand value, and lack of segmental details.
- Persistent Systems Ltd.: Excluded due to engagement in product development, R&D activities, and lack of segmental details.
- Infobeans Technologies Ltd.: Excluded for providing KPO services, significant intangibles, and abnormal revenue increase.
- Tata Elxsi Ltd.: Excluded for high-end services, R&D activities, and lack of segmental details.
- Mindtree Ltd. & Nihilent Ltd.: Excluded for diversified services, significant onsite revenue, and lack of segmental details.
- Great Software Laboratory Pvt. Ltd.: Excluded for diverse activities, ownership of intangibles, and lack of segmental details.
- Cygnet Infotech Pvt. Ltd.: Excluded for diversified services, ownership of intangibles, and lack of segmental details.
- Cybage Software Pvt. Ltd.: Excluded for diversified services, product development, and lack of segmental details.
- Consilient Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Aptus Software Labs Pvt. Ltd.: Remanded for fresh consideration based on annual reports and FAR analysis.

4. Inclusion of Certain Comparables:
The assessee sought the inclusion of:
- Batchmaster Software Pvt. Ltd.: Remanded to the Ld.TPO for comparability analysis based on FAR.
- Indianic Infotech Ltd.: Remanded for verification based on annual reports and filters.

5. Corporate Tax Issues:
The assessee raised issues regarding computational errors, incorrect consideration of returned income, non-inclusion of Section 10AA deduction, and erroneous levy of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The Tribunal directed the Ld.AO to verify these claims based on the evidence provided by the assessee.

Conclusion:
The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed, with directions for necessary verifications and adjustments as per the Tribunal's observations. The Tribunal emphasized the need for functional comparability and appropriate adjustments in transfer pricing cases.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates