Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2024 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (7) TMI 451 - HC - Indian Laws


Issues:
1. Challenge to classification of account as Non Performing Asset (NPA) on June 30, 2023.
2. Challenge to Notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 dated September 11, 2023.

Issue 1: Classification of Account as NPA on June 30, 2023:
The petitioners contested the NPA classification, arguing that their credit limit was never exceeded, and the credit facility was recalled before the classification date. They claimed the bank's reliance on RBI Circulars was misplaced as they were issued post the NPA classification. The petitioners also alleged the bank levied unauthorized interests. The bank justified the NPA classification under RBI Circulars stating the account was not renewed within 180 days of the last renewal, leading to the NPA declaration on June 30, 2023. The court upheld the NPA classification, emphasizing the bank acted within RBI guidelines.

Issue 2: Notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002:
The petitioners challenged the notice under Section 13(2), contending it lacked detailed reasons for the NPA classification. The bank argued the notice was procedural and justified under Section 13(2) due to the upheld NPA classification. The court found the notice valid, given the justified NPA classification, and dismissed the challenge. Subsequent actions under Section 13(4) were deemed justified post the upheld NPA classification.

The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the NPA classification and Section 13(2) notice, with no costs awarded. The petitioners were advised to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act if desired. An interim order of protection post-judgment was refused to maintain consistency with the dismissal decision.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates