9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2007 (4) TMI 327 - AT - Service TaxTransport of goods- the appellant contention was that during the period in question, as the service tax was not applicable on the goods transport services. The same was brought into the service tax net by section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 by an amendment in the year 2000. In the light of decided judgments held that Show Cause Notice in the present case has been issued subsequent to the amendment brought to the Finance Act with regard to GTO Services, while the SCN was required to have been issued prior to the amendment. Thus the demand has been set-aside and allow the appeal.
Issues:
1. Confirmation of service tax on goods transport operators (GTOs) for the period prior to the amendment date. Analysis: The appeal in this case arose from Order-in-Original No. 178/2004-ST, where service tax was confirmed on the services of goods transport operators during a specific period. The appellant contended that during the relevant period, service tax was not applicable to GTOs and was only introduced by an amendment in the year 2000. The appellant argued that the amendment did not have a retrospective effect, and therefore, the confirmation of service tax was not sustainable. The appellant relied on various judgments, including one by the President's Bench and another by the Supreme Court, to support their contention. The appellant emphasized that these judgments have been consistently applied in similar cases and should be considered in this matter as well. Upon careful consideration, the Tribunal noted that the show-cause notice in this case was issued after the relevant amendment to the Finance Act concerning GTO services. It was observed that the show-cause notice should have been issued before the amendment, as established in the judgments cited by the appellant. The Tribunal acknowledged that in similar cases, demands have been set aside on these grounds. Consequently, the Tribunal, respecting the principles established in the cited judgments, decided to set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief deemed necessary.
|
