Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2024 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (9) TMI 776 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
1. Service Tax liability on 'Transportation of Goods by Road' (GTA) Services on reverse charge mechanism basis.
2. Applicability of Notification No. 33/2004-S.T. dated 03.12.2004 and Notification No. 04/2010-S.T. dated 27.02.2010.
3. Invocation of extended period provisions for issuing Show Cause Notice.
4. Legislative intent regarding retrospective effect of Notification No. 04/2010-S.T.
5. Interpretation of the case-law of M/s. Gujarat Pulses Manufacturing Association v. Union of India [2018 (15) G.S.T.L. 584 (Guj.)].

Analysis:

1. The appellant, a public sector undertaking under the State Government of Bihar, was issued a Show Cause Notice for not discharging Service Tax liability on 'Transportation of Goods by Road' services. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand, including interest and penalty, based on the appellant's failure to pay Service Tax. The appellant contested this before the Tribunal.

2. The appellant argued that they believed they were exempt from paying Service Tax under GTA services for transporting agricultural products, relying on Notification No. 33/2004-S.T. and subsequent amendments. They contended that the extended period provisions for issuing the Show Cause Notice were unjustified, citing the case-law of M/s. Gujarat Pulses Manufacturing Association v. Union of India.

3. The Revenue countered by emphasizing that Notification No. 04/2010-S.T. had no retrospective effect and only applied from its specified date. They justified the demand and urged the dismissal of the appeal.

4. The Tribunal, after reviewing the case and the cited case-law, found the issue to be narrow. Referring to the judgment in M/s. Gujarat Pulses Manufacturing Association v. Union of India, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant's case fell within the scope of limitation. The Tribunal allowed the appeal solely on the ground of limitation, without delving into the merits of the case.

5. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, following the precedent set by the Hon'ble High Court, without further discussion on the substantive issues raised by the parties.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates