Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2024 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (12) TMI 424 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Appeal against order of ld. Commissioner of Income-tax Appeals-3, Chennai for Assessment Year 2018-19 denying deduction under section 80IC for delayed submission of Form 10CCB.

Analysis:

1. The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income-tax Appeals-3, Chennai for Assessment Year 2018-19, denying the deduction under section 80IC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 due to delayed submission of Form 10CCB.

2. The assessee filed its original return of income for the relevant assessment year on 23.10.2018 and submitted Form 10CCB to claim the deduction under section 80IC of the Act on 05.11.2018. The assessment under section 143(1) of the Act was completed based on the revised return without allowing the deduction for the delayed submission of Form 10CCB.

3. The ld. CIT (A) dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee after considering detailed submissions and case laws, relying on a decision of the ITAT in a similar case. The assessee then appealed to the Appellate Tribunal, challenging the addition to the income and the denial of the deduction under section 80IC.

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee included challenging the addition to income and the denial of the deduction under section 80IC by the Assessing Officer. The assessee argued that the delay in filing Form 10CCB was minimal and did not warrant the denial of the deduction.

5. During the hearing, the assessee's representative argued that the audit report was obtained before filing the return of income, and Form 10CCB was filed with a slight delay. The representative cited relevant case laws and argued that the deduction should be allowed based on the timing of the submission of Form 10CCB.

6. The Revenue's representative objected to the assessee's submissions, emphasizing the importance of following procedural rules. The Revenue relied on a decision related to a different section of the Act to support its argument against allowing the deduction.

7. In response, the assessee's representative highlighted the distinction between exemption and deduction under the Act, asserting that the relevant provisions supported the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80IC. The representative argued that the facts of the present case warranted the allowance of the deduction.

8. After considering the submissions and evidence, the Appellate Tribunal observed that the assessee had filed Form 10CCB before the completion of assessment proceedings under section 143(1) of the Act. The Tribunal referred to previous decisions where similar claims were allowed based on the timing of filing Form 10CCB.

9. The Tribunal noted that a coordinate Bench had allowed a similar claim in a previous case, emphasizing the importance of filing Form 10CCB before the completion of assessment proceedings. The Tribunal found the facts of the present case to be similar and decided to allow the claim of the assessee.

10. The Tribunal distinguished the Revenue's reliance on a different decision related to exemption under a separate section of the Act, emphasizing that the issue in the present case pertained to deduction and not exemption. The Tribunal, therefore, allowed the claim of the assessee based on previous decisions and the specific provisions of the Act.

11. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the Tribunal pronounced the order in favor of the assessee on the grounds of the timing of filing Form 10CCB and the provisions of section 80IC of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates