Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (12) TMI 994 - HC - GSTChallenge to impugned order - contravention of provisions of the CGST/TNGST Act particularly Section 132(1)(b) of the CGST/TNGST Act - cancellation of registration of petitioner - violation of principles of natural justice - HELD THAT - The petitioner company is entitled to vent out its grievances against the impugned order before the GST Tribunal in terms of Section 112 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act 2017. However as on date the GST Tribunal is yet to be constituted. Since the petitioner has no other alternate remedy as on date this writ petition is maintainable. Hence this writ petition is taken up on merits and disposed of. It appears to be a violation of the principles of natural justice in as much as the petitioner was not heard before its registration was cancelled by the 1st respondent vide order dated 12.11.2021. However the fact remains that the petitioner s place of business was visited by the Enforcement Department and it was found that the petitioner had a small space for carrying on the business. There are no reasons to interfere with the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent. Even if personal hearing was granted by the 1st respondent the consequence would have been the same. The impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent is in detail and the same cannot be challenged. Petition dismissed.
The petitioner challenged an order canceling their GST registration. The High Court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner can apply for fresh registration. The court found no reason to interfere with the order of cancellation. The petitioner's place of business was found to have limited space for business activities. The court noted that the petitioner facilitated bogus credit to customers. The petitioner can appeal to the GST Tribunal once constituted.
|