2025 (1) TMI 580 - AAR - GST

Bonded warehouse transaction or not - whether the transfer of title of goods by the Applicant to its customers or multiple transfers within the FTWZ would result in bonded warehouse transaction covered under Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017 r/w CGST Amendment Act, 2018 - applicability of Integrated Tax (IGST) Circular No. 3/1/2018 dated 25.05.2018 - HELD THAT - Whether the transfer of title of goods by the Applicant within the Free Trade Warehousing Zone (FTWZ) qualifies as a bonded warehouse transaction under Schedule III of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, read with the CGST Amendment Act, 2018? - HELD THAT - A Free Trade Warehousing Zone , as the name suggests, is a bonded premises providing warehousing facility, much in parity with the bonded warehouse under the Customs Act. Further, when the goods are imported and brought into a FTWZ unit, they are basically warehoused first and then traded or subjected to other authorized operations as the case may be. It is noticed that the applicant s queries for advance ruling in the instant case is restricted to the first stage, i.e., when the imported goods are supplied to any person before they are cleared for home consumption, while they still remain warehoused. Accordingly, the provisions of 8 (a) of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017, viz., Supply of warehoused goods to any person before clearance for home consumption applies to the instant case. Whether the Integrated Tax (IGST) Circular No. 3/1/2018 dated 25.05.2018 is applicable to the present factual situation? - HELD THAT - The reversal of proportionate input tax credit of common inputs/input services/Capital goods is not warranted at the hands of the Applicant in terms of the amended Section 17 (3) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Explanation 3 of Rule 43 of the CGST Rules, 2017, even when the activity/transaction in question is covered under paragraph 8 (a) of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017, as long as it does not relate to supplies from Duty Free Shops at arrival terminal in international airports to the incoming passengers. Conclusion - i) The transfer of title of goods by the Applicant to its customers or multiple transfers within the FTWZ gets covered under paragraph 8 (a) of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017, and remain non-taxable. ii) The applicant is not required to reverse any ITC of common inputs/input services/Capital goods, even when the activity/transaction in question is covered under paragraph 8 (a) of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017, as the value of exempt supplies in relation to transaction covered under paragraph 8 (a) has already been prescribed, and it relates only to supplies from Duty Free Shops at arrival terminal in international airports to the incoming passengers.

1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The legal judgment presented involves the following core issues:

1. Whether the transfer of title of goods by the Applicant within the Free Trade Warehousing Zone (FTWZ) qualifies as a bonded warehouse transaction under Schedule III of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, read with the CGST Amendment Act, 2018.

2. Whether the Integrated Tax (IGST) Circular No. 3/1/2018, dated 25.05.2018, applies to the present factual situation.

3. Whether the activities and transactions fall under paragraph 8 (a) or 8 (b) of Schedule III of the CGST Act and remain non-taxable.

4. Whether input tax credit (ITC) would be available without reversals, given no prescription has been notified for the purpose of Explanation (ii) below Section 17 (3) of the CGST Act.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue 1: Transfer of Title within FTWZ as Bonded Warehouse Transaction

Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The CGST Act, 2017, Schedule III, and the Customs Act, 1962, provide the legal framework for determining whether transactions within FTWZ are treated as bonded warehouse transactions.
Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court analyzed the definitions of "warehoused goods" and "warehouse" under the Customs Act, 1962, and considered the provisions of the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Act, 2005, which defines FTWZ as a special category of SEZ.
Key Evidence and Findings: The court found that FTWZ operates similarly to a bonded warehouse under the Customs Act, allowing duty-free storage and multiple title transfers without physical movement of goods.
Application of Law to Facts: The court applied the provisions of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017, and concluded that the transfer of title within FTWZ falls under paragraph 8 (a), treating it as a non-taxable supply.
Treatment of Competing Arguments: The court considered the applicant's argument that FTWZ is equivalent to a bonded warehouse and the jurisdiction officer's claim that FTWZ is not licensed under the Customs Act.
Conclusions: The transfer of title within FTWZ is covered under paragraph 8 (a) of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017, and remains non-taxable.

Issue 2: Applicability of IGST Circular No. 3/1/2018

Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The IGST Circular No. 3/1/2018 clarifies the levy of IGST on goods supplied while being deposited in customs bonded warehouses.
Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court noted that the circular has been rescinded by Circular No. 04/01/2019, rendering it inapplicable to the current situation.
Key Evidence and Findings: The court acknowledged that the circular was relevant for customs bonded warehouses but not applicable to FTWZ transactions.
Application of Law to Facts: Since the circular was no longer in effect, it did not apply to the applicant's transactions within FTWZ.
Treatment of Competing Arguments: The jurisdiction officer's view that the circular does not apply to FTWZ was upheld.
Conclusions: The IGST Circular No. 3/1/2018 is not applicable to the applicant's transactions within FTWZ.

Issue 3: Classification under Paragraph 8 (a) or 8 (b) of Schedule III

Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: Paragraphs 8 (a) and 8 (b) of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017, outline non-taxable supplies involving warehoused goods.
Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court analyzed the nature of transactions within FTWZ and determined that they align with paragraph 8 (a), which covers supply of warehoused goods before clearance for home consumption.
Key Evidence and Findings: The court found that the applicant's transactions involved transfer of title without physical movement, consistent with paragraph 8 (a).
Application of Law to Facts: The court concluded that the applicant's activities fall under paragraph 8 (a) and are non-taxable.
Treatment of Competing Arguments: The applicant's alternative argument for paragraph 8 (b) was considered but found inapplicable due to the nature of the transactions.
Conclusions: The applicant's transactions are covered under paragraph 8 (a) of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017.

Issue 4: Availability of ITC without Reversals

Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: Section 17 (3) of the CGST Act, 2017, and related rules govern the apportionment of ITC for exempt supplies.
Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court considered the amendment to Section 17 (3) and the rules prescribing ITC reversal for specific transactions.
Key Evidence and Findings: The court noted that the prescribed ITC reversal applies only to supplies from Duty Free Shops at arrival terminals, not to the applicant's transactions.
Application of Law to Facts: The court determined that the applicant is not required to reverse ITC for their transactions under paragraph 8 (a) of Schedule III.
Treatment of Competing Arguments: The applicant's argument against ITC reversal was supported by the absence of specific prescription for their transactions.
Conclusions: The applicant is entitled to avail ITC without reversal for transactions covered under paragraph 8 (a) of Schedule III.

3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

Preserve Verbatim Quotes of Crucial Legal Reasoning: "The transfer of title of goods by the Applicant to its customers or multiple transfers within the FTWZ gets covered under paragraph 8 (a) of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017, and remain non-taxable."
Core Principles Established: Transactions within FTWZ that involve transfer of title without physical movement are treated as non-taxable under paragraph 8 (a) of Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017.
Final Determinations on Each Issue: The court ruled that the applicant's transactions are non-taxable under paragraph 8 (a), the IGST circular is inapplicable, and ITC is available without reversal.

← Previous Next →