2025 (1) TMI 811 - AT - Income Tax

Addition being reimbursement of expenses incurred during the official tour for business purpose - whether reimbursed expenses as alleged perquisites in the hands of the Appellant? - HELD THAT - Assessee was the founder and Managing Director of company as engaged in the business of export of spices, pickles etc. During the year under consideration approximately 98% of the Revenue of the company came from export of it s products. Assessee, being the Managing Director was required to travel to various countries and as per company policy expenses incurred for official purposes were reimbursed by the company directly to the credit card companies. As the company had a substantial turnover of Rs. 159 cores largely from export of it s products, keeping into consideration the confirmation given by M/s. ADF Foods that these reimbursements made to the assessee were for his official visits, keeping into consideration the fact that certain expenses which were found to be of a personal nature were not been reimbursed to the assessee by M/s. ADF Foods Ltd. and also in light of the fact that out of a turnover of Rs. 159 crores, only Rs. 4 crores were incurred towards travelling expenses, we are of the considered view that in light of these facts the addition made by the AO is liable to be deleted. - Decided in favour of assessee.

1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal question in this judgment is whether the addition of Rs. 40,03,034/- as taxable income in the hands of the assessee, which was reimbursed by M/s. ADF Foods Ltd. for expenses incurred during official tours, was justified. Specifically, the issues are:

Whether the reimbursement of expenses incurred by the assessee during official tours constitutes taxable income or non-taxable reimbursement for business purposes.
Whether the expenses reimbursed should be considered as 'perquisites' under tax laws.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue 1: Nature of Reimbursement - Taxable Income or Business Expense?

Relevant legal framework and precedents: The legal framework revolves around the classification of reimbursements as either taxable income or non-taxable business expenses. The key consideration is whether the expenses were incurred for personal benefit or for the business purposes of the company.
Court's interpretation and reasoning: The court examined the nature of the expenses and the company's policy on reimbursement. It considered the substantial export turnover of the company and the role of the assessee as Managing Director, which necessitated travel for business purposes.
Key evidence and findings: The court noted the confirmation from M/s. ADF Foods Ltd. that the expenses were for official visits. It also considered the company's policy of reimbursing only official expenses and not personal ones.
Application of law to facts: The court applied the principle that expenses incurred for business purposes and reimbursed by the company should not be treated as taxable income. The court found that the company had a clear policy distinguishing between personal and official expenses.
Treatment of competing arguments: The court considered the arguments of the Assessing Officer and the Ld. CIT(A) that the expenses were personal in nature. However, it found the evidence provided by the assessee, including the company's confirmation, more compelling.
Conclusions: The court concluded that the addition of Rs. 40,03,034/- as taxable income was not justified, as the expenses were indeed for business purposes and were correctly reimbursed under the company's policy.

Issue 2: Classification as 'Perquisites'

Relevant legal framework and precedents: The classification of reimbursements as 'perquisites' depends on whether they provide a personal benefit to the employee beyond business needs.
Court's interpretation and reasoning: The court reasoned that the expenses did not constitute 'perquisites' as they were incurred solely for business purposes and were in line with the company's reimbursement policy.
Key evidence and findings: The court highlighted that the company did not reimburse personal expenses, such as the Bangkok trip, which supported the claim that reimbursed expenses were for business purposes.
Application of law to facts: The court applied the principle that 'perquisites' must provide a personal benefit, which was not the case here, as the expenses were business-related.
Treatment of competing arguments: The court considered the argument that the reimbursements were 'perquisites' but found it unsubstantiated due to the clear demarcation of personal and business expenses by the company.
Conclusions: The court concluded that the expenses were not 'perquisites' and should not be taxed as such.

3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

Verbatim quotes of crucial legal reasoning: "Taking into consideration the confirmation given by M/s. ADF Foods that these reimbursements made to the assessee were for his official visits... the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted."
Core principles established: Reimbursements for business expenses, when substantiated by company policy and evidence, should not be treated as taxable income or 'perquisites'. The distinction between personal and business expenses is crucial.
Final determinations on each issue: The court allowed the appeal, concluding that the Rs. 40,03,034/- reimbursed for business travel should not be added to the taxable income of the assessee.

In summary, the court's decision underscores the importance of clear evidence and company policy in determining the tax treatment of reimbursed expenses. The judgment emphasizes that reimbursements for legitimate business purposes should not be classified as taxable income or 'perquisites'.

← Previous Next →