9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2025 (1) TMI 1018 - HC - GSTRetrospective cancellation of the Goods and Services Tax GST registration of the petitioner-assessee - it is contended that in the absence of the SCN having embodied any intent of the respondents to cancel the registration with retrospective effect the action would not sustain - HELD THAT - Reliance in this respect is placed on the decision rendered in Riddhi Siddhi Enterprises v. Commissioner of Goods and Services Tax (CGST) South Delhi Anr 2024 (10) TMI 278 - DELHI HIGH COURT where it was held that In view of the fact that Petitioner does not seek to carry on business or continue the registration the impugned order dated 15.12.2021 is modified to the limited extent that registration shall now be treated as cancelled with effect from 04.09.2021 i.e. the date when the Show Cause Notice was issued. The stipulation contained in the impugned order dated 29 April 2024 and which ordains that the cancellation of registration would take effect from 02 July 2017 quashed - petition allowed. 1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED The core legal issue considered in this judgment is the legality and validity of the retrospective cancellation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration of the petitioner. Specifically, the court examined whether the cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect was justified and in accordance with the statutory scheme under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act). 2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Legal Framework and Precedents The relevant legal framework for this issue is Section 29 of the CGST Act, which outlines the conditions under which a GST registration can be cancelled. Sub-section 29(2) allows for cancellation from a retrospective date if the circumstances warrant such action. The court referred to previous judgments, including Riddhi Siddhi Enterprises v. Commissioner of Goods and Services Tax and Ramesh Chander v. Assistant Commissioner of Goods and Services Tax, to understand the application of this section. Court's Interpretation and Reasoning The court emphasized that while the CGST Act provides the power to cancel registration retrospectively, the exercise of this power must be reasoned and demonstrate due application of mind. The court noted that the mere existence of the power does not justify its automatic application. The court insisted that any order of cancellation must clearly outline the reasons for retrospective application, considering the significant consequences such an action entails. Key Evidence and Findings The court found that the Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued to the petitioner did not specify any intent to cancel the registration retrospectively. Furthermore, the final order of cancellation lacked detailed reasoning and failed to address why retrospective cancellation was deemed necessary. The court also noted that the petitioner had not submitted a reply to the SCN, which was a factor in the cancellation decision. Application of Law to Facts The court applied the principles established in previous cases to the current scenario, highlighting the need for objective criteria and clear reasoning when cancelling GST registration retrospectively. The lack of such reasoning in the SCN and the final order led the court to conclude that the cancellation was not sustainable. Treatment of Competing Arguments The respondents argued that the petitioner's failure to respond to the SCN justified the cancellation. However, the court found this argument insufficient, as the cancellation order did not provide adequate reasoning for its retrospective application. The court also considered the potential consequences for the petitioner's customers, who might be denied input tax credit due to the retrospective cancellation. Conclusions The court concluded that the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration was unjustified due to the lack of reasoning and clarity in the cancellation order. The court quashed the stipulation in the impugned order that set the effective date of cancellation as 02 July 2017, instead ruling that the cancellation should take effect from the date of the SCN, 08 October 2022. 3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS Preserve Verbatim Quotes of Crucial Legal Reasoning The court stated, "The power to cancel retrospectively can neither be robotic nor routinely applied unless circumstances so warrant." This emphasizes the necessity for careful consideration and reasoning when applying retrospective cancellation. Core Principles Established The judgment reinforces the principle that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires clear and objective reasoning, as well as a demonstration of due application of mind. The power to cancel retrospectively should not be exercised mechanically or without sufficient justification. Final Determinations on Each Issue The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the retrospective cancellation of GST registration. The cancellation was ordered to take effect from the date of the SCN, 08 October 2022, rather than the earlier date stipulated in the impugned order.
|
