9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Appeal for reduction of redemption fine in lieu of confiscation of a truck. Analysis: The legal judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi involved an appeal regarding the reduction of redemption fine in lieu of the confiscation of a truck. The appellant, represented by Advocate Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, argued that there was a mistake apparent on the record as a plea for reduction of redemption fine was not addressed in the previous order. The plea highlighted that the appellant had no knowledge of the illicit use of the truck for transporting contraband goods and had taken precautions to prevent such unlawful use. The Tribunal acknowledged the plea but noted that it was not clearly articulated in the appeal memorandum. Despite this, the Tribunal extended the benefit of the doubt to the appellant based on relevant citations and held that there was a mistake in not addressing the plea. In the context of reducing the fine in lieu of confiscation, the appellant relied on a previous judgment involving a similar case where the redemption fine was reduced due to specific circumstances. The appellant argued that similar circumstances existed in their case as the Adjudicating Authority had found that they had no knowledge of the truck's illicit use. However, the Tribunal, after careful consideration, rejected this plea. The Tribunal emphasized that the quantum of fine in such cases is determined by the specific facts and circumstances of each case, including the nature and quantity of the smuggled goods. In this case, considering the significant amount of silver found in the truck, the Tribunal upheld the fine of Rs. 50,000 imposed by the Adjudicating Authority. Overall, the Tribunal's decision was to maintain the fine of Rs. 50,000 in lieu of confiscation of the truck, based on the specific circumstances and the nature of the goods involved. This decision was made a part of the Tribunal's previous order dated 10-11-1989.
|
