9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Appeal against order passed by Collector of Customs (Appeals) for not attaching order-in-assessment; Interpretation of Customs Act, 1962 regarding appeal rights based on bill of entry.
Issue 1: Appeal without order-in-assessment M/s. Khemka Travels appealed against Collector of Customs (Appeals) Bombay's order for not attaching an order-in-assessment. The appellant argued that the bill of entry itself serves as an assessment order and is appealable. The respondent, represented by the SDR, acknowledged that no separate order was passed by the Assistant Collector, and assessment was done based on the bill of entry. Both sides agreed to remand the matter to the Collector of Customs (Appeals) Bombay. Issue 2: Interpretation of Customs Act, 1962 The Tribunal examined the appeal dismissal by the Collector of Customs (Appeals) Bombay due to lack of an order-in-assessment. It was noted that the appellant had attached the bill of entry with the appeal memo, as required by Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. Reference was made to Sections 17 and 47 of the Act regarding duty assessment and goods clearance. Citing the Glaxo Laboratories case, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing reasons for decisions to ensure effective appeal rights. The Tribunal also referred to the Privy Council's ruling in the Secretary of State v. Mask & Co. case, highlighting that adjudication decisions are appealable under Section 128. Conclusion: Based on legal precedents and statutory provisions, the Tribunal found the appeal maintainable against the order of assessment under Section 17 of the Customs Act, 1962. As the Collector of Customs (Appeals) did not decide on merits, the matter was remanded to ensure a fair hearing and timely resolution. The Tribunal directed the Collector of Customs (Appeals) Bombay to decide on the appeal within three months, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice.
|
