9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Interpretation of Open General Licence (OGL) under Import Policy 1990-93 - Validity of Letter of Credit (L.C.) for importation of goods - Allegation of fresh commitment post-deletion of item from OGL - Confiscation of imported goods under Section 111(d) of Customs Act, 1962 - Imposition of fine and penalty under Sections 111(d) and 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 Analysis: Interpretation of Open General Licence (OGL) under Import Policy 1990-93: The case involved the appellants filing a Bill of Entry for clearance of a consignment declared as Moulds under the Open General Licence (OGL). The dispute arose when the item covering Moulds was deleted from the OGL. The appellants argued that their shipment was covered under OGL based on certain Public Notices issued by the Chief Controller of Imports and Exports. The Additional Collector confiscated the goods, but the appellants contended that their import was permissible under specific Public Notices allowing pre-ban commitments for goods covered by irrevocable Letter of Credit opened before the deletion of the item from OGL. The Tribunal examined the relevant Public Notices and found in favor of the appellants, allowing the appeal. Validity of Letter of Credit (L.C.) for importation of goods: The dispute centered around the validity and extension of the Letter of Credit for the importation of goods. The appellants argued that the extension of the Letter of Credit by their bank amounted to a revalidation of the original L.C. opened before the deletion of the item from OGL. The Tribunal analyzed the timeline of the L.C. extension, shipment dates, and relevant communications between the banks. Based on the findings, the Tribunal concluded that the goods were imported against the original L.C. and within the permissible period, as outlined in the Public Notices, supporting the appellants' position. Allegation of fresh commitment post-deletion of item from OGL: The Revenue contended that any fresh commitments made by the appellants after the deletion of the item from OGL were not permissible. The Additional Collector imposed penalties and fines based on this argument. However, the Tribunal found that the extensions of the L.C. by the appellants did not constitute new commitments but were valid extensions of the original L.C., allowing the importation of the goods under OGL as per the relevant Public Notices. Confiscation of imported goods under Section 111(d) of Customs Act, 1962: The Additional Collector had confiscated the imported moulds under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, citing non-compliance with OGL provisions. However, the Tribunal's analysis of the L.C. validity and extension, along with adherence to Public Notices, led to the decision to set aside the confiscation order and allow the clearance of the goods against OGL. Imposition of fine and penalty under Sections 111(d) and 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962: In addition to confiscation, the appellants were imposed a fine and personal penalty under Sections 111(d) and 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal's ruling in favor of the appellants negated the basis for these penalties, as the importation of the goods was found to be permissible under the OGL provisions and the original Letter of Credit terms. Overall, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowed the appeal, and upheld the appellants' right to clear the imported moulds against the Open General Licence, emphasizing the importance of adherence to the terms of the Letter of Credit and relevant Public Notices in import transactions.
|
