9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether the freight in the assessable value of the car should be added from the port of shipment or the country of origin. Analysis: The Appellate Tribunal, CEGAT, New Delhi, heard an appeal filed by the Collector of Customs, Cochin, challenging an order passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals). The main issue was the inclusion of freight charges in the assessable value of a car, specifically whether the freight should be added from the port of shipment or the country of origin. The appellant argued that the freight should be added from the country of origin, citing a previous decision of the Tribunal in a similar case. The respondent did not appear, but written arguments were submitted. The Tribunal considered the arguments presented by the appellant and reviewed the records and written submissions. It was noted that the issue had already been settled in a previous judgment by the Tribunal. The Tribunal reiterated that the freight charges should be included in the assessable value based on the country of manufacture of the car. The Tribunal upheld the earlier decision and allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, directing that the freight at a specific amount should be added to the value of the car, rather than a percentage of the depreciated value. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that the freight in the assessable value of the car must be added from the country of origin, specifically at the mentioned amount. As a result, the appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed, and the Tribunal disposed of the appeal and the stay application accordingly. The decision was based on the precedent set by previous Tribunal judgments and the specific circumstances of the case. Overall, the judgment clarified the method for calculating the assessable value of the car, emphasizing the importance of adding freight charges from the country of origin rather than the port of shipment. The decision was in line with established legal principles and previous Tribunal rulings on similar matters.
|
