9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods under the DEEC scheme. 2. Jurisdiction of officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) in seizing goods. 3. Classification of imported goods as acrylic tow and assessment of duty. 4. Imposition of redemption fine and penalty under the Customs Act. Issue 1: Misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods under the DEEC scheme: The appeal concerned the import of prime acrylic tow misdeclared as synthetic waste under the DEEC scheme. The Collector of Customs found the goods to be prime virgin fresh goods, not synthetic waste as declared. The unit price was undervalued at US $1.35 per kg, leading to the imposition of a redemption fine and penalty. The appellant disputed the findings, arguing that the goods were substandard tow and not prime quality acrylic as determined through various tests and examinations. Issue 2: Jurisdiction of DRI officers in seizing goods: The appellant questioned the jurisdiction of DRI officers in seizing the goods and drawing samples. The appellant contended that the DRI officers were not proper officers for seizure, citing a case precedent from the Delhi High Court. However, the respondent defended the actions of the DRI officers, highlighting the confirmation of test results by various authorities and referring to relevant customs regulations supporting the jurisdiction of DRI officers. Issue 3: Classification of imported goods and assessment of duty: Upon examination, it was established that the imported goods were prime quality acrylic tow, contradicting the declaration of synthetic waste. The goods were classified under Heading No. 5501.30 of the Customs Tariff Act, and the assessable value was determined at US $1.76 per kg. The Tribunal confirmed this classification and assessment, agreeing with the Collector of Customs' findings. Issue 4: Imposition of redemption fine and penalty under the Customs Act: The Collector of Customs imposed a redemption fine of Rs. 2 lakh and a penalty of Rs. 1 lakh due to misdeclaration and undervaluation. The Tribunal, considering the circumstances, reduced the fine to Rs. 1 lakh and the penalty to Rs. 50,000. The Tribunal upheld the imposition of the fine and penalty under the Customs Act, with modifications to the amounts based on the overall circumstances of the case. In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the Collector of Customs' decision regarding the misdeclaration, classification, and assessment of duty on the imported goods, while modifying the redemption fine and penalty imposed under the Customs Act. The jurisdiction of DRI officers in seizing the goods was deemed valid, and the appeal by the importer was partly allowed with adjustments to the fines and penalties.
|
