Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 1995 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1995 (12) TMI 119 - AT - Customs

Issues Involved:
1. Classification of Foot Step Bearings under Heading 84.63 or 84.38(1) of CTA, 1975.
2. Eligibility of Roller Retainers/Metal Cages for the benefit of Notification No. 35/75 (as amended).

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Classification of Foot Step Bearings

Arguments by the Importer:
- The importer argued that Foot Step Bearings should be classified under Heading 84.38(1) as components of textile machinery rather than under Heading 84.63 as bearings.
- The importer highlighted that Foot Step Bearings are simple mechanical parts without balls or rollers, serving only a supporting function to keep the spindle in position without vibration.

Arguments by the Department:
- The Department maintained that Foot Step Bearings are correctly classified under Heading 84.63 as plain shaft bearings. They emphasized that these bearings provide a smooth bearing surface, supporting rotating shafts and guiding moving parts.

Tribunal's Analysis:
- The Tribunal reviewed the technical literature and expert authorities on the classification of bearings.
- It was noted that plain bearings, including Foot Step Bearings, support rotating shafts and guide moving parts, thus fitting the description under Heading 84.63.
- The Tribunal concluded that the classification under Heading 84.63 is appropriate, as the bearings are used in connection with machinery, which does not alter their classification.

Conclusion:
- Foot Step Bearings are correctly classifiable under Heading 84.63 as bearings.

Issue 2: Eligibility of Roller Retainers/Metal Cages for Notification No. 35/75

Arguments by the Importer:
- The importer contended that Roller Retainers/Metal Cages should be eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 35/75, arguing that they are integral parts of textile machinery.
- The importer claimed that the required certificate from the Textile Commissioner had been submitted.

Arguments by the Department:
- The Department argued that Roller Retainers/Metal Cages are classifiable under Heading 84.62, which is not covered by Notification No. 35/79.
- The Assistant Collector had rejected the claim for exemption based on the classification under Heading 84.62.

Tribunal's Analysis:
- The Tribunal examined the technical literature, which described the function and classification of anti-friction bearings and their components, including cages.
- It was found that Roller Retainers/Metal Cages are indeed parts of bearings and are classifiable under Heading 84.62.
- The Tribunal noted that Heading 84.62 is not covered by the exemption Notification No. 35/79.

Conclusion:
- Roller Retainers/Metal Cages are correctly classifiable under Heading 84.62 and are not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 35/79.

Final Judgment:
- The order of the Collector (Appeals) is modified, restoring and confirming the Assistant Collector's order in full.
- The department's appeal is accepted, and the assessee's appeals are rejected.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates