1998 (8) TMI 159 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai, in the case of Faq Precision Bearing v. Commissioner and Rosemount India Ltd. v. Commissioner, held that a notice under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act is required for recovery of erroneous refund after review proceedings under Section 35E. The Tribunal followed the Supreme Court judgment in Collector v. Re-Rolling Mills, upholding the requirement of such notice within the prescribed time limit. The appeals were rejected based on this precedent.