1998 (11) TMI 165 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues: Classification of heat exchangers under Tariff Item 29A or 68

In this case, the issue revolved around the correct classification of heat exchangers manufactured by the assessee under either Tariff Item 29A or 68. The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, heard the appeal after the jurisdictional authority remanded the case for expert opinion. The department contended that the heat exchangers should be classified under Tariff Item 29A, while the assessee argued for classification under Tariff Item 68.

The expert Appraiser from the local Customs House and scientists at CMERI, Durgapur, provided opinions. The Appraiser considered the heat exchangers as component parts of the oxygen plant, supporting classification under Tariff Item 68. On the other hand, the Durgapur authorities viewed the heat exchangers as part of a sub-system within the air liquification plant. Based on these opinions and observations of the oxygen plant's functioning, the adjudicating authority classified the goods under Tariff Item 68, leading to the Revenue filing an appeal against this decision.

The appeal memorandum highlighted a statement from the Durgapur authorities suggesting that the heat exchangers were part of a refrigeration system, indicating classification under Tariff Item 29A. However, the respondents argued that the heat exchangers were integral to the manufacturing plants falling under Tariff Item 68, aligning with the Board's tariff advice.

The Tariff Entry under consideration, Tariff Item 29A, covered refrigerating and air-conditioning appliances and machinery, including parts thereof. The Board's advice clarified that heat exchangers would fall under Tariff Item 29A only if designed for use in refrigerating and air conditioning appliances. The structure of the Tariff Entry indicated that the heat exchangers manufactured by the respondents were not intended to fall under this category.

After analyzing the tariff advice and the structure of the Tariff Entry, the Tribunal concluded that the classification claimed by the assessee under Tariff Item 68 was correct. Upholding the order of the adjudicating authority, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue.