Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1998 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1998 (10) TMI 154 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Classification of pipe fittings under Central Excise Tariff from 1-3-1986 to 29-2-1988; Effectiveness of revised classification list filed under protest on 27-1-1988; Manufacturing activity of bending pipes to make reducers and tees; Applicability of judgments in determining classification; Alignment of Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN) with Central Excise Tariff.

Issue 1 - Classification of Pipe Fittings:
The appeals revolve around the classification of bends, reducers, and tees used as Buttwelding type fittings under the Central Excise Tariff. The original classification under Heading 73.05 was challenged by the appellants, who filed a fresh classification list under sub-heading 7305.00 on 27-1-1988. The Assistant Collector confirmed the original classification, but the appellate authority set it aside due to a violation of natural justice principles. Eventually, the classification under Heading 73.05 was upheld by the Collector (Appeals) based on the approved classification list filed by the appellants themselves.

Issue 2 - Revised Classification List Effectiveness:
The Collector (Appeals) examined whether the revised classification list filed under protest on 27-1-1988 could be effective retrospectively without a show cause notice. It was determined that the approval granted on 1-2-1988 for the classification list filed on 27-1-1988 made it effective from the date of submission, as per Rule 173B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Issue 3 - Manufacturing Activity of Bending Pipes:
The learned Counsel argued that bending pipes to create reducers and tees did not amount to manufacturing as the original pipes remained unchanged. Citing a Supreme Court judgment, it was contended that the items should be classified as pipes and tubes. However, the Revenue contended that post-HSN alignment, the items were akin to pipe fittings and should be classified under Heading 73.07 of the Central Excise Tariff.

Issue 4 - Applicability of Judgments in Determining Classification:
The Tribunal considered various judgments, including those related to the classification of pipe fittings under different tariff headings. It was noted that post-HSN alignment, the classification of MS pipes, bends, etc., fell under Heading 7307. The Tribunal relied on definitions from scientific dictionaries to support the classification under the new tariff heading.

Issue 5 - Alignment of HSN with Central Excise Tariff:
The Tribunal analyzed the impact of aligning the Harmonized System of Nomenclature with the Central Excise Tariff on the classification of goods. Relying on previous judgments, it was concluded that the classification under Heading 7305 was correct post-alignment, and the demand for duty was upheld from 1-3-1986 onwards.

In conclusion, the Tribunal rejected the appeals, affirming the classification of pipe fittings under Heading 73.05 of the Central Excise Tariff and emphasizing the correctness of the classification list effective from the date of submission. The judgments cited, definitions referred to, and the alignment of the HSN with the Tariff played crucial roles in determining the classification of the goods in question.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates