2005 (4) TMI 15 - HC - Income Tax

Interest earned on the amounts kept in special deposit account - we find that the respondent had kept the amount of loan in a bank account. Free will is immaterial. If the assessee has earned the interest on the said amount it is taxable under the head of Income from other sources and therefore the Tribunal has committed error in holding that the amount of interest is not taxable and shall go to reduce the cost of construction - held that interest earned from other sources has rightly held income from other sources

Summary

Issues:
1. Taxability of interest earned on amounts kept in a special deposit account as a capital receipt.

Analysis:
The High Court of ALLAHABAD was presented with a question regarding the taxability of interest earned on amounts kept in a special deposit account by a co-operative society for the purpose of construction and installation of machinery for a sugar mill. The society had obtained loans from financial institutions, including the Industrial Finance Corporation of India (IFCI), and was required to keep the loan amounts in a special bank account as per the loan agreement. The assessing authority considered the interest earned on the special deposit account as taxable income from other sources, rejecting the society's contention that it should be treated as reducing the capital cost of construction. The Tribunal, however, ruled in favor of the society, stating that the interest earned was incidental to the loan terms and conditions specified by IFCI and was related to the construction purpose, thus not taxable but deductible from the cost of construction.

In the subsequent arguments, the Revenue's counsel contended that the interest earned during the construction stage should be treated as income from other sources, citing a Supreme Court decision. On the other hand, the society's counsel argued that the account was opened under the compulsion of the loan agreement with IFCI, and the interest earned should not be considered as income but as a reduction in the capital cost of construction. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court's decision, emphasizing that even before commencing business, income from various sources can be taxable, including interest earned on surplus funds invested. The Court concluded that the interest earned on the loan amount kept in the bank account should be taxed under "Income from other sources," contrary to the Tribunal's decision to treat it as non-taxable and deductible from the construction cost.

In alignment with the Supreme Court's decision and a previous judgment, the High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the interest earned on the special deposit account should be considered taxable income from other sources. The Court emphasized that the interest earned during the construction stage, even if not from business operations, falls under the purview of taxable income. Therefore, the question posed was answered in the negative, favoring the Revenue and against the assessee, without any costs imposed on either party.