Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2001 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2001 (2) TMI 386 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
1. Interpretation of Notification No. 16/94-C.E. dated 30-3-1994 regarding Modvat credit on excisable goods.
2. Validity of Modvat credit availed on Gate Passes issued before 1-4-1994 after 30-6-1994.
3. Admissibility of Modvat credit under Rule 57G of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Issue 1: Interpretation of Notification No. 16/94-C.E. dated 30-3-1994:
The judgment discusses the amendment in the duty payment mechanism for excisable goods effective from 1-4-1994, requiring duty payment on invoices instead of Gate Passes (GP). Notification No. 16/94-C.E. dated 30-3-1994 allowed Modvat credit on duty paid using GPs issued before 1-4-1994 until 30-6-1994. The notification specified conditions for availing Modvat credit, emphasizing the issuance date of documents and the credit-taking deadline.

Issue 2: Validity of Modvat credit availed post 30-6-1994:
M/s. Montari Industries Ltd. availed Modvat credit of Rs. 2,20,463/- based on GPs issued before 1-4-1994. However, the Department contended that as per the notification, Modvat credit on such GPs was valid only until 30-6-1994. The Additional Commissioner held that since credit entries were made in RG. 23A Pt. I after 1-7-1994, the party was ineligible for the benefit under the notification, leading to the recovery of the credited amount under Rule 57-I and Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Issue 3: Admissibility of Modvat credit under Rule 57G:
The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the decision, prompting an appeal challenging the denial of Modvat credit post 30-6-1994. The appellant cited previous judgments supporting the acceptance of Modvat credit even after the specified deadline. The judgment referred to various precedents and legal interpretations, ultimately disagreeing with the appellant's stance and referring the issue to the Hon'ble President for consideration by a Larger Bench to resolve conflicting opinions.

In conclusion, the judgment delves into the nuances of Notification No. 16/94-C.E. dated 30-3-1994, the eligibility criteria for Modvat credit on pre-1-4-1994 GPs, and the conflicting interpretations regarding the admissibility of such credit post 30-6-1994. The referral to a Larger Bench signifies the complexity and importance of the legal issue at hand, warranting further clarification and resolution.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates