2001 (2) TMI 392 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
1. Benefit of Modvat credit on Pollution Control Equipment.
2. Interpretation of the definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
3. Applicability of Notification No. l4/96-C.E. (N.T.), dated 23-7-1996.
4. Legal precedent regarding Pollution Control Equipment as an integral part of the manufacturing process.
5. Admissibility of Modvat credit on Pollution Control Equipment.

Analysis:
1. The ld. Commissioner (Appeals) granted the benefit of Modvat credit on Pollution Control Equipment based on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of IFFCO v. CCE, Ahmedabad and other cases. The Revenue appealed, arguing that the equipment did not meet the definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

2. The Revenue contended that Pollution Control Equipment and Cooling Equipment did not qualify as capital goods under the relevant rules. The ld. DR highlighted the changes in the capital goods scheme through Notification No. l4/96-C.E. (N.T.), dated 23-7-1996, which allowed Modvat credit on specified goods irrespective of their use in production or processing.

3. The Tribunal noted the Supreme Court's judgment in IFFCO v. CCE, Ahmedabad, where it was established that Pollution Control Equipment is an essential part of the manufacturing process. Referring to subsequent cases and legal precedents, the Tribunal upheld that Pollution Control Equipment qualifies for Modvat credit based on its integral role in the manufacturing process.

4. Following the legal principles established by the Supreme Court and previous Tribunal decisions, the Tribunal concluded that Pollution Control Equipment is eligible for Modvat credit. The impugned order granting the benefit of Modvat credit on Pollution Control Equipment was upheld, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.

Conclusion:
The judgment reaffirmed the eligibility of Pollution Control Equipment for Modvat credit based on its integral role in the manufacturing process, as established by legal precedents and the interpretation of relevant rules and notifications.