9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Interpretation of proviso to section 131(1) of the Indian Companies Act
The judgment of the High Court of Madras addressed the issue of the correct interpretation of the proviso to section 131(1) of the Indian Companies Act. The main question was whether the power to extend the period for laying a balance sheet and profit and loss account applied to the initial 18-month period after incorporation or only to subsequent periods. The court analyzed the relevant provisions of the Indian Companies Act and compared them to the English Companies Act of 1929, from which the Indian statute was derived. The key contention was whether the term "the period" in the proviso encompassed both the initial 18-month period and subsequent periods, or if it was limited to the subsequent periods of nine or twelve months. The court considered the general principles of statutory interpretation, including the rule that singular words may include the plural unless context dictates otherwise. It also examined the practical implications of allowing the Registrar to extend different periods for different types of accounts, concluding that the use of the singular term "the period" was appropriate in this context. Ultimately, the court agreed with the lower court's interpretation that the Registrar had the authority to extend the initial 18-month period for laying the first balance sheet and profit and loss account. The judgment emphasized that the language of the proviso, the legislative intent, and the practical considerations supported this interpretation. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded in the case.
|
