1999 (10) TMI 540 - AT - Customs

Summary

Issues:
Challenge against penalty imposition by Commissioner of Customs based on violation of principles of natural justice.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed challenging the penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs imposed by the Commissioner of Customs on the appellants. The case originated from the interception of a truck carrying dry ginger of Chinese origin valued at Rs. 8,40,000. Statements from the driver and another individual indicated discrepancies in the goods loaded and the sample shown. The Customs Officers seized the goods and the truck under the Customs Act, leading to a show cause notice issued to the appellants. The appellants denied knowledge of the goods and innocence in the matter. Despite requesting documents relied upon in the notice, they were not provided. The appellants contended that the impugned order violated principles of natural justice.

Upon careful consideration, the Tribunal found merit in the appellants' argument regarding the violation of natural justice. The adjudicating authority did not furnish the documents relied upon in the show cause notice to the appellants, leading to a lack of opportunity for them to defend themselves adequately. The impugned order was based on a bill of entry naming the appellants as consignees, which was not referenced in the notice. The lower authority's findings were based on documents not disclosed to the appellants, depriving them of a fair chance to contest the allegations. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order concerning the appellants and remanded the case for fresh consideration in compliance with natural justice principles.

In light of the violation of natural justice, the Tribunal directed the lower authority to provide the appellants with copies of all documents referred to in the impugned order and show cause notice. The appellants were to be granted a personal hearing for their case to be re-evaluated. The amount of Rs. 1 lakh deposited by the party pursuant to a stay order was to be retained for further proceedings under the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a detailed and reasoned decision by the lower authority after considering the appellants' case based on the personal hearing granted to them.