Pricing Login

Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice : Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

For Sales / Support:
WhatsApp

9911796707

Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes

TMI - e-Newsletter TaxTMI Goods matched documents like e-way bill and... TaxTMI NRI's unexplained mutual fund investment & capital... TaxTMI Land sale profit: Business income or long-term... TaxTMI Lending business earned interest spread, no... TaxTMI Money laundering case: Balancing PMLA bail... TaxTMI Export of service partly performed outside India... TaxTMI Technical testing firm wins CENVAT credit case;... TaxTMI Excess Input Tax Credit penalty appeal dismissed... TaxTMI Transport agency's bundled services disqualify it... TaxTMI Taxman overreached by turning limited scrutiny into... TaxTMI Genuine anonymous donations not taxable. Grants not... TaxTMI Property investment source verification not valid... TaxTMI Income Tax Assessment Notice Issued by... TaxTMI Freight charges paid to foreign shipping co. not... TaxTMI Massive financial fraud via sham deals to launder... TaxTMI Latest Case-Laws TaxTMI Latest Notifications + Circulars TaxTMI GST Council Decisions TaxTMI

Follow us:

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2000 (11) TMI AT This

Login
Summary

Forgot password New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo

2000 (11) TMI 914 - AT - Central Excise

The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata ruled that Ceramic Tiles used for flooring in a factory do not qualify as refractory materials for claiming duty credit. The appeal was rejected, and the appellants were directed to repay Rs. 95,135.20 taken on the Ceramic Tiles.

← Previous Next →

Quick Updates:

What's New:
Latest Case Laws

What's New:
Latest Notifications

What's New:
Latest Circulars

H: Penalty on concealment deleted due to lack of evidence of deliberate u...

H: Company's expenses disallowed, but no penalty as details disclosed; Tr...

H: Resolving Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate Extension: Supreme Court Allows ...

H: Court allows appeal against retrial order for evidence forgery; uphold...

H: Provisions restricting input tax credit on goods/services for construc...

H: Tax Penalty Notice Defects: Grounds Must Be Clear.

H: Taxpayer gets relief under tax dispute resolution scheme despite pendi...

H: Lack of jurisdiction for AO to invoke Sec 153C without receiving mater...

H: Writ challenging assessment dismissed; assessee availed remedy of appe...

H: Income from house property additions - ALV capped at Rs.8.39L for 2015...

H: Fraudulent employee mishandling led to embezzlement loss deductible u/...

H: Taxpayer challenges legality of vague penalty notice - CIT(Appeals) om...

H: Tax-free dividend income, interest-free funds disallowance relaxed, TD...

H: Property renovation costs wrongly disallowed; Revenue authorities over...

H: Charity trust's registration wrongly denied, court orders re-evaluatio...

F: Labour Cess applicable on cost of construction without GSt or gross cost

F: Merger of two GSTIN in the same State - Procedure to be followed

F: interest lability on ITC when payment to supplier is made after 180 days

F: GST on Solar Plant

F: ITC Issue in case of Acqusition of Company in Insolvency

F: Stock damaged in recent floods

F: TDS dedudted after 3 years after reporting invoices in GSTR 1

F: Time limit to upload Form GST MOV-09 on GST portal

A: PENALTY ON DIRECTORS CONTRAVENING EXPORT REGULATIONS UNDER FOREIGN EXC...

A: Difference between “License” and “Royalty”

A: Penalty proceedings under Section 130 of the CGST Act cannot be initia...

N: Inland Container Depots for loading and unloading of goods - Seeks to ...

C: Guidelines to Stock Exchanges, Clearing Corporations and Depositories

T: Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Re-Assessment Notices Issued During ...

A: Director Identification Number