1974 (8) TMI 84 - HC - Companies Law

Officer, Winding up - Powers of liquidator, Powers of court to grant relief in certain cases

Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Section 281 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913.
2. Status of the official liquidator as an officer of the company.
3. Liability for penal interest under Section 244B(7) of the Indian Companies Act, 1913.
4. Relief under the repealed Section 281 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Applicability of Section 281 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913:
The primary issue was whether Section 281 of the old Act could be invoked for granting relief to the liquidators. The Registrar of Companies contended that since the old Act was repealed, Section 281 did not survive, and thus, the application under this section was misconceived. However, the court noted that Section 641 of the new Act allows the provisions of the old Act to continue for liquidation proceedings initiated before the new Act came into force. Therefore, Section 281 of the old Act was applicable, and the court had the authority to grant relief.

2. Status of the Official Liquidator as an Officer of the Company:
The court examined whether the liquidators could be considered officers of the company. The Registrar argued that liquidators, appointed by the court, were officers of the court and not the company. The court, however, held that a liquidator represents the company during liquidation proceedings, acting on its behalf. Citing precedents from the Kerala, Calcutta, and Mysore High Courts, the court concluded that a liquidator is indeed an officer of the company, even if not explicitly mentioned in the inclusive definition under Section 2(11) of the old Act or Section 2(30) of the new Act.

3. Liability for Penal Interest under Section 244B(7) of the Indian Companies Act, 1913:
The liquidators were found to have retained an amount of Rs. 892.73, exceeding the permissible limit under Section 244A, and failed to deposit an unclaimed dividend of Rs. 952.84 in the Reserve Bank within the stipulated time under Section 244B. The Registrar demanded penal interest at 20% per annum for these defaults. The court noted that the liquidators acted under a bona fide mistake of law, believing that the unclaimed dividend had to be deposited at the dissolution of the company. They had also spent personal funds for the company's winding-up process, indicating no personal gain from the retained amounts.

4. Relief under the Repealed Section 281 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913:
The court addressed whether relief could be granted under Section 281, given its repeal. It was observed that Section 641 of the new Act allows the old Act's provisions to apply to ongoing liquidation proceedings. Additionally, Section 633 of the new Act, analogous to Section 281, empowers the court to grant relief for bona fide breaches. The court found that the liquidators acted honestly and reasonably, without personal profit, and thus deserved relief from penalties under Section 244B(7).

Conclusion:
The court concluded that the liquidators were officers of the company and that Section 281 of the old Act was applicable. The liquidators' bona fide mistake and lack of personal gain warranted relief from penal interest and penalties. The appeal was allowed, and the order imposing penal interest was set aside, with no costs awarded for the appeal.

← Previous Next →