Article Section |
|
Home Articles Experts This
|
Submit New Article
|
|
|
Articles - Knowledge sharing |
Showing 9621 to 9640 of 9880 Records |
|
|
WHETHER CENVAT CREDIT IS ADMISSIBLE ON MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FOR POWER PLANT SITUATED AWAY FROM FACTORY?
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
March 12, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
RATE OF SERVICE TAX LOWERED
7 Comments
|
|
By: - Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
Dated:
March 5, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
View Profile
|
|
|
SECTION 54 and 54F - SALE PROCEEDS VS INVESTMENT IN RESIDENTIAL HOUSE - liberal approach to achieve purpose of investment in residential houses is required.
1 Comment
|
|
By: - C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
March 3, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Tribunal must decide the appeal on merit if adjournment is not allowed as requested by both parties before it- practice of multiplying cases by dismissal of appeals is not proper.
|
|
By: - C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
March 3, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
REGISTRATION UNDER SERVICE TAX PROVISIONS
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
March 2, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
INSURANCE AUXILIARY SERVICES
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
March 2, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
For Brain Storming: NO JUSTIFICATION ON HIGHER MUNICIPAL TAX ON PROPERTY USED AS OFFICE.
|
|
By: - C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 28, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
IMPACT OF THE REDUCTION IN EXCISE DUTY AND SERVICE TAX
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
February 26, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
GRADING OF INITIAL PUBLIC OFFER
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
February 26, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
UN-NECESSARY APPEALS BY REVENUE MUST BE AVOIDED- A RECENT CASE BEFORE SUPREME COURT in case of CIT, Dibrugarh versus Doom Dooma India Ltd. 2009 -TMI - 32437 shows un-necessary litigation by revenue on issues which were settled long ago.
|
|
By: - C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 25, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Regarding WDV in case of computation of income under Rules 7A, 7B and 8 of the income Tax Rules- recent judgment of Kerala HC- a critique
|
|
By: - C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 25, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
TWIN REQUIREMENTS TO BE CONSIDERED WHILE DEALING WITH APPLICATION TO DISPENSE WITH THE PRE DEPOSIT OF PENALTY IN AN APPEAL TO APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
February 25, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
'Business Profit' includes depreciation written back in context of section 32AB. However, the question of law left open by the Supreme Court - also some relevant discussion on binding nature of judgments or persuasive value.
|
|
By: - C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 24, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
THE SERVICE TAX RETURN PREPARER SCHEME, 2009 - AN OVERVIEW
2 Comments
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
February 24, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
DRAW BACK RULES CANNOT OVERRIDE PROVISIONS OF CUSTOMS ACT, 1962
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
February 19, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
Income -tax deducted at source is consideration received for services or for goods sold hence cannot be deducted from consideration for the purpose of levying any tax like service tax, VAT or Sale Tax.
|
|
By: - C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 16, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
DETERMINATION OF BUSINESS PROFIT IN PROPERTY BUSINESS - Sold parts attract taxable income even if entire project is not yet complete , cost or market value whichever is less should be adopted for stock-in-trade at year end.
|
|
By: - C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 16, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
SUBSTANTIVE BENEFIT CANNOT BE DENIED ON A PROCEDURAL OR TECHNICAL GROUND WHERE THE BENEFICIARY HAS SATISFIED THE SUBSTANTIVE CONDITIONS FOR THE BENEFIT
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
February 16, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
THE FACT OF AMALGAMATION DOES NOT GIVE ANY IMMUNITY FOR PAST DEEDS OF DIRECTORS
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
February 16, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
'MAT' AND NECESSARY ADJUSTMENT IN BOOK PROFIT IN VIEW OF NOTES, OBSERVATION, DISCLOSURES OR QUALIFICATION ON ACCOUNTS SECOND ARTICLE IN VIEW OF RECENT JUDGMENT OF DELHI HIGH COUTRT
|
|
By: - C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 10, 2009
|
|
All Articles by:
C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
|
............ |
|