Article Section | |||||||||||
Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal Experts This |
|||||||||||
SHOW CAUSE NOTICE AND ITS REPLY FOR ADJUDICATION |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
SHOW CAUSE NOTICE AND ITS REPLY FOR ADJUDICATION |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Adjudication proceedings in any assessment or penal proceedings is a very important aspect of tax administration. It provides an opportunity to the assessee to be heard and show cause before any action is taken in proceedings relating to him. Issue of show cause notice is a pre-condition to a proper adjudication which is an intimation to assessee of the proposed action by the department. The adjudicating officer adjudicates the show cause notice by considering the reply to show cause notice and other available or produced evidences by the noticee. A SCN should follow certain principles to be legally sustainable. Adjudication under GST Law Section 73(1) provides for : (a) Service of notice by proper officer; (b) Notice shall be served on the person who is chargeable with tax, who has –
(c) Such amounts as mentioned above shall be required to be determined along with the applicable interest as per Section 50 and penalty leviable under the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder. Section 74(1) provides for – (a) Service of notice by proper officer; (b) Notice shall be served on the person who is chargeable with tax, who has –
(c) Such amounts as mentioned above shall be required to be determined along with the applicable interest as per Section 50 and penalty equivalent to the tax specified in the notice. How to reply to SCN Whenever a show cause notice (SCN) is issued to an assessee, it has a purpose because the law does not allow the revenue authorities to confirm any demand of tax, penalty, fees or any other amount without adjudication. Adjudication is a quasi-judicial process involving exercise of judicial powers to decide or adjudicate any issue after allowing the other party to defend himself and provide opportunity of being heard for the same. The opportunity to the assessee is provided through a SCN issued to him which has to be responded in any one or more of the following manners :
The SCN is issued with specific directions to the assessee to show cause as to why what is proposed in the SCN should not be confirmed. Generally, the SCN contains the following paras:
Therefore, it is important that SCN should invariably be replied and it should:
Contents of SCN reply The body of SCN reply should generally contain the following:
The reply may have more than one ground of defence depending on case to case. The main grounds can be drafted and also adequately explained in the reply with basic, reasoning, factual matrix, interpretation of law and judicial pronouncements. Once the main grounds which are specific to the case are explained, there could be certain grounds which may be common in most of the SCN’s. These could be one or more of the following:
The Noticee submits and confirms that in case any other information or documents or record or explanation is further considered necessary for adjudication of the SCN, it shall submit the same at the earliest so as to ensure proper and fair adjudication of the proposed SCN. The Noticee further submits and prays that no demand should be confirmed for want of documents / explanation from Noticee’s side.
“In view of the foregoing, it is respectfully prayed that the proceedings initiated in the above SCN may kindly be dropped. In any case, we should be given an opportunity of personal hearing before a final decision is taken in the matter.” It should be ensured that personal hearings are attended to by the assessee or his authorized representative and submissions made.
By: Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal - June 7, 2023
Discussions to this article
Dear Sir, Really valuable information and vital points. Regarding the Sections 73(1) & 74(1), the wordings are similar to each other. What is the difference between these 2 sections? Thanks,
Nice article.. explained everything in detail and simple language. Thanks
Dear Mr. Raghu, Thanks, If you found contents useful.
Dear Mr. Manoharan, Section 73 deals with determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised for any reason other than fraud or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. On the other hand, Section 75 deals with determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised by reason of fraud or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. I hope the difference is clear.
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||