Article Section | |||||||||||
Home Articles Customs - Import - Export - SEZ Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN Experts This |
|||||||||||
CLASSIFICATION OF THERMAL PRINTER RIBBON - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
CLASSIFICATION OF THERMAL PRINTER RIBBON - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
In M/S HID INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AIRPORT AND AIR CARGO COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 2023 (7) TMI 1065 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS CUSTOMS, MUMBAI, the applicant is engaged in the import, sales and distribution of various HID brand products, primarily access control cards, readers and printers. The applicant proposed to import the products commonly known as ‘Thermal Printer Ribbon’ (‘TPR’ for short) designed for use with thermal ID card printers. There has been no authoritative determination on classification of the said product by the Proper Officers of the Customs. Therefore the applicant filed an application for getting ruling from the Authority for Advance Ruling on the following questions-
The applicant submitted the following before the Authority for Advance Ruling-
The applicant also relied on the following judgments-
The Authority for Advance Ruling has gone through the records of the case, oral and written submissions made by the applicant, which include various CTHs descriptions, sections and chapter notes as well as HSN Explanatory Notes. The Authority for Advance Ruling observed that the applicant proposed to import the products commonly known as ‘TPR’ which is specifically designed for use with thermal ID card printers. The similar products in the past have been classified under the Heading CTH 8443 as well as under CTH 9612. This indicates that there can be two contending classifications for the same product under First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act. The Authority for Advance Ruling analyzed the components of TPR and also Section Note 2 of Section XVI. The Authority for Advance Ruling also analyzed the judgments relied on by the petitioner. The Authority for Advance Ruling considered that before reaching any definitive conclusion it is essential to examine other possible classification i.e. 9612 - typewriter or similar ribbons inked or otherwise prepared for giving impressions, whether or not on spools or in cartridges, ink-pads, whether inked or not inked, with or without boxes. The Authority for Advance Ruling observed that as per the Explanatory Notes for CTH 9612, in order for a ribbon to fall under the said category, it must be inked to give impressions. In the present case the pigmented dye and/or resins is never transferred to the card by means of impact but due to the heat on the printer head. Therefore the Authority for Advance Ruling accepted the contentions of the applicant that the TPR will not fall under CTH 9612. The Authority for Advance Ruling ruled that the TPR is correctly classifiable under the CTH 8443 99 59 of the First Schedule of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The rate of duty applicable to TPR falling under the CTH 8443 99 59 is BCD - Nil and IGST is at 18%.
By: Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN - July 29, 2023
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||