Article Section | |||||||||||
FREEBIES TO DOCTORS – NOT ALLOWABLE EXPENDITURE BUT TAXABLE IN HANDS OF DOCTORS- CBDT. |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
FREEBIES TO DOCTORS – NOT ALLOWABLE EXPENDITURE BUT TAXABLE IN HANDS OF DOCTORS- CBDT. |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Links and references: Section 28 and 37 of the Income –tax Act, 1961. CBDT Circular No. 5/2012 [F. No. 225/142/2012-ITA.II], dated 1-8-2012 Indian Medical Council (Professional conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 found webhosted at: Recent circular: The CBDT has issued circular No. 5/2012 [F. No. 225/142/2012-ITA.II], dated 1-8-2012. This instructs that freebies provided by pharmaceutical companies, diagnostic centers, and others in medical business to doctors is illegal (in popular terms - bribes) and not allowable in hands of provider but is taxable in hands of recipients as income. Confusions: On reading of articles and logs on some websites it is felt that a confusion has been created in a manner that even free samples provided to doctors are covered by the circular. But that is not the case. Samples are not covered. Circular: To understand meaning of the circular the same is reproduced below with highlights added by author: “It has been brought to the notice of the Board that some pharmaceutical and allied health sector Industries are providing freebees (freebies) to medical practitioners and their professional associations in violation of the regulations issued by Medical Council of India (the ‘Council’) which is a regulatory body constituted under the Medical Council Act, 1956. 2. The council in exercise of its statutory powers amended the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 (the regulations) on 10-12-2009 imposing a prohibition on the medical practitioner and their professional associations from taking any Gift, Travel facility, Hospitality, Cash or monetary grant from the pharmaceutical and allied health sector Industries. 3. Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act provides for deduction of any revenue expenditure (other than those failing under sections 30 to 36) from the business Income if such expense is laid out/expended wholly or exclusively for the purpose of business or profession. However, the explanation appended to this sub-section denies claim of any such expense, if the same has been incurred for a purpose which is either an offence or prohibited by law. Thus, the claim of any expense incurred in providing above mentioned or similar freebees in violation of the provisions of Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 shall be inadmissible under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act being an expense prohibited by the law. This disallowance shall be made in the hands of such pharmaceutical or allied health sector Industries or other assessee which has provided aforesaid freebees and claimed it as a deductible expense in its accounts against income. 4. It is also clarified that the sum equivalent to value of freebees enjoyed by the aforesaid medical practitioner or professional associations is also taxable as business income or income from other sources as the case may be depending on the facts of each case. The Assessing Officers of such medical practitioner or professional associations should examine the same and take an appropriate action. This may be brought to the notice of all the officers of the charge for necessary action.” Observations of author: The circular does not cover free samples of medicines which are provided to doctors for making them aware of new products. Such samples are not for sale and doctors should not sell them. The circular covers other freebies like meeting expenses of conferences, travel, expenses on children, gifts for doctors and his family members etc. All these are in nature of incidental receipts of profession, perquisites, benefits or advantages to the doctor. These are taxable as income from business or profession under section 28. However, it will generally depend on disclosure made by the recipient and undisclosed income can only be unearthed by proper survey and search on premises of doctors. Restrictions on samples is also required: Medicines can be prescribed with generic names. Brand names can be known from directories of medicines. In case of very old formulations of medicines, the doctors are well aware of the same and therefore free samples are not necessary. Therefore, provision of free samples is not desirable in case of popular and old medicines. In case of newly invented or launched medicines also providing samples should be restricted to a limited period. Disallowance of expenses: Disallowance of expenses on such freebies is instructed because such provisions are not as per law. In view of author, the provisions of such freebies are in nature of un-ethical bribes to doctors for the following reasons:
Mere disallowance is not enough: Making provisions for disallowance is not enough. This will not put check on malpractices. Serious action by people and concerned authorities are required to force doctors to desist from such practices. It is unfortunate that the regulatory authorities of medical profession have not been able to check malpractices in medical profession though the same are very rampant and very well felt by the public. Expeditious enquiry and punishment is desired. What is more important is that the moral of doctors should be improved. They should not consider themselves as a money making machine working without sensibility. Some relevant provisions: Some relevant provisions are reproduced below which shows that it is necessary to ensure that the doctors adhere to professional standard not as a compulsion or statutory requirement but as a natural duty and moral obligation of doctors to the society. From the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 we find the following provisions which are relevant in this regard: - DECLARATION OF MEDICAL PRACTIONER (DOCTOR): A medical practioner is required to obtain registration from the concerned medical council. For such registration each applicant is required to read, make and abide by the following declarations : I solemnly pledge myself to consecrate my life to service of humanity.
I make these promises solemnly, freely and upon my honour. Unethical acts of doctors are provide din the Rule 6 in Chapter 6 6. UNETHICAL ACTS an shall not aid or abet or commit any of the following acts which shall be construed as unethical 6.1 Advertising:
6.1.2 Printing of self photograph, or any such material of publicity in the letter head or on sign board of the consulting room or any such clinical establishment shall be regarded as acts of self advertisement and unethical conduct on the part of the physician. However, printing of sketches, diagrams, picture of human system shall not be treated as unethical. 6.2 Patent and Copy rights: A physician may patent surgical instruments, appliances and medicine or Copyright applications, methods and procedures. However, it shall be unethical if the benefits of such patents or copyrights are not made available in situations where the interest of large population is involved. 6.3 Running an open shop (Dispensing of Drugs and Appliances by Physicians): - A physician should not run an open shop for sale of medicine for dispensing prescriptions prescribed by doctors other than himself or for sale of medical or surgical appliances. It is not unethical for a physician to prescribe or supply drugs, remedies or appliances as long as there is no exploitation of the patient. Drugs prescribed by a physician or brought from the market for a patient should explicitly state the proprietary formulae as well as generic name of the drug. 6.4.1 A physician shall not give, solicit, or receive nor shall he offer to give solicit or receive, any gift, gratuity, commission or bonus in consideration of or return for the referring, recommending or procuring of any patient for medical, surgical or other treatment. A physician shall not directly or indirectly, participate in or be a party to act of division, transference, assignment, subordination, rebating, splitting or refunding of any fee for medical, surgical or other treatment. “6.8 Code of conduct for doctors and professional association of doctors in their relationship with pharmaceutical and allied health sector industry. 6.8.1 In dealing with Pharmaceutical and allied health sector industry, a medical practitioner shall follow and adhere to the stipulations given below:- d) Cash or monetary grants: A medical practitioner shall not receive any cash or monetary grants from any pharmaceutical and allied healthcare industry for individual purpose in individual capacity under any pretext. Funding for medical research, study etc. can only be received through approved institutions by modalities laid down by law / rules / guidelines adopted by such approved institutions, in a transparent manner. It shall always be fully disclosed. (ii) Ensure that such a research project(s) has the clearance of national/ state / institutional ethics committees / bodies. (iii) Ensure that it fulfils all the legal requirements prescribed for medical research. (vi) Ensure that undue animal experimentations are not done and when these are necessary they are done in a scientific and a humane way. g) Affiliation: A medical practitioner may work for pharmaceutical and allied healthcare industries in advisory capacities, as consultants, as researchers, as treating doctors or in any other professional capacity. In doing so, a medical practitioner shall always: (ii) Ensure that patients interest are not compromised in any way. (iii) Ensure that such affiliations are within the law. (iv) Ensure that such affiliations / employments are fully transparent and disclosed. Note: Clause 6.8 was inserted vide “Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) (Amendment) Regulations, 2009 - Part-I”. 7. MISCONDUCT : The following acts of commission or omission on the part of a physician shall constitute professional misconduct rendering him/her liable for disciplinary action:
7.6 Sex Determination Tests: On no account sex determination test shall be undertaken with the intent to terminate the life of a female foetus developing in her mother’s womb, unless there are other absolute indications for termination of pregnancy as specified in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. Any act of termination of pregnancy of normal female foetus amounting to female foeticide shall be regarded as professional misconduct on the part of the physician leading to penal erasure besides rendering him liable to criminal proceedings as per the provisions of this Act.
in contravention of the above provisions shall constitute gross professional misconduct on the part of the physician. 7.9 Performing or enabling unqualified person to perform an abortion or any illegal operation for which there is no medical, surgical or psychological indication. (Note: The foregoing does not restrict the proper training and instruction of bonafide students, midwives, dispensers, surgical attendants, or skilled mechanical and technical assistants and therapy assistants under the personal supervision of physicians.) 7.11 A physician should not contribute to the lay press articles and give interviews regarding diseases and treatments which may have the effect of advertising himself or soliciting practices; but is open to write to the lay press under his own name on matters of public health, hygienic living or to deliver public lectures, give talks on the radio/TV/internet chat for the same purpose and send announcement of the same to lay press. 7.12 An institution run by a physician for a particular purpose such as a maternity home, nursing home, private hospital, rehabilitation centre or any type of training institution etc. may be advertised in the lay press, but such advertisements should not contain anything more than the name of the institution, type of patients admitted, type of training and other facilities offered and the fees. 7.13 It is improper for a physician to use an unusually large sign board and write on it anything other than his name, qualifications obtained from a University or a statutory body, titles and name of his speciality, registration number including the name of the State Medical Council under which registered. The same should be the contents of his prescription papers. It is improper to affix a sign-board on a chemist’s shop or in places where he does not reside or work.
In case of communicable / notifiable diseases, concerned public health authorities should be informed immediately. Conclusions: On reading of the related provisions it is obvious that there are strict regulations on profession of doctors however, public is well aware that these regulations are not complied with and there are large scale violations. Referral commission, and prescription commission, freebies, etc are very common. To some extent one can understand and consider the same as a compensation for low fees being charged by doctors (this situation is only few cases). However, as a professional, doctors can charge higher fees in a transparent manner. The ill effect of commission culture is very severe, and this culture should be reduced in all respect. Purchase officers in government, public sector and even in private sectors are habituated of asking and getting commission for placing purchase orders and ensuring, approval of goods and payment etc. Even a domestic help working at homes, or a peon in office and a driver of vehicles makes extra bucks by way of commission when they purchase some items or avail some services for the employer. This is unfortunate, but is a reality. If an employer be strict and keep always vigilant eyes to avoid such commission being received by his employees, he may not be able to get people in spite of good salary being paid – this is truth of commercial life and this is not new this has remained part of life for very old times, but now-a-days there is too much prevalence of commission culture. The reason is too much of greed which causes corruption. Corruption in government hospitals is cause of corruption in private hospitals: Another answer for such commission culture in medical profession lies in underlying indiscipline and inactivity and corruption in government hospitals. In government hospitals due to less than normal working, keeping equipments non-functional, not keeping hospitals properly , private medical facilities are promoted. If spending in government hospitals is efficient, if subordinate staff in government work fully, properly and diligently, the hospitals will be neat and clean, the doctors will find environment to work and will spend more time to take care of patients. However, our politicians through trade unions lend support to indiscipline amongst subordinate staff and group D employees. If government hospitals be neat and clean, the private hospitals may have to close down because patients will prefer to go to government hospitals. Therefore, one can say that corruption in private medical sector is because of massive corruption in government medical sector. We find indication of such corruption in many ways including some TV serials like Satyamev Jayte and Crime Petrol which have aired strong signals of such corruption.
By: DEVKUMAR KOTHARI - August 7, 2012
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||