Article Section | |||||||||||
“Input Service Distributor need not be a ‘manufacturer’ or ‘output service provider’ for availing Cenvat credit” |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
“Input Service Distributor need not be a ‘manufacturer’ or ‘output service provider’ for availing Cenvat credit” |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Dear Professional Colleague, Input Service Distributor need not be a ‘manufacturer’ or ‘output service provider’ for availing Cenvat credit We are sharing with you an important judgment of Hon’ble CESTAT, New Delhi, in the case of Moser Baer India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida [2015 (1) TMI 1093 - CESTAT NEW DELHI] on the following issue: Issue: Whether Input Service Distributor must be a ‘manufacturer’ or ‘output service provider’ for availing Cenvat credit? Facts and background: Moser Baer India Ltd. (“the Appellant”) is the manufacturer of CDR, CD Rom, DVDR and DVD Rom, falling under Chapter Heading 85 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, at their factory situated at Noida. The Head Office of the Appellant, located at Okhla, Delhi is registered as an Input Service Distributer (“ISD”) in terms of Rule 2(m) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 (“the Credit Rules”). The Head Office was discharging Service tax liability under Reverse Charge for the various services received by them from foreign country. The Service tax so paid by them was distributed by the Head Office to the Appellant’s factory at Noida, which was utilized by the Appellant in their factory located at Noida. The Department contended that in as much as the Service tax was being paid by the Head Office, which was neither engaged in the manufacture of any excisable goods nor providing any output services, they were not entitled to avail the said credit and in turn not entitled to pass on the said credit to the Appellant’s factory located at Noida. Being aggrieved, the Appellant preferred an appeal before the Hon’ble CESTAT, Delhi. Held: The Hon’ble CESTAT, Delhi after analysing Rule 2(m) and Rule 7 of the Credit Rules held that:
Therefore, the Hon’ble Tribunal allowed the Cenvat credit to the Appellant transferred from their Head Office. Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us. Thanks and Best Regards, Bimal Jain FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons) Delhi: Flat No. 34B, Ground Floor, Pocket - 1, Mayur Vihar, Phase - I, Delhi - 110091, India Desktel: +91-11-22757595/ 42427056 Mobile: +91 9810604563 Chandigarh: H. No. 908, Sector 12-A, Panchkula, Haryana - 134115 Kolkata: Ist Floor, 10 R G Kar Road Shyambazar, Kolkata - 700 004 Email: [email protected] Web: www.a2ztaxcorp.com Disclaimer: The contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the authors nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this document nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Readers are advised to consult the professional for understanding applicability of this newsletter in the respective scenarios. While due care has been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions herein is not ruled out. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without our written permission.
By: Bimal jain - February 6, 2015
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||