Article Section | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance of the word ‘And’ used in the definition of Taxable Services |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance of the word ‘And’ used in the definition of Taxable Services |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the clause (105) of section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994, providing the meaning of taxable services, at many places the word "And" has been used. The use of word "And" is very important and relevant aspect to determine the exact nature of taxability of a particular service. For an example, in sub-clause (j) clearing and forwarding service is a taxable service. In this sub-clause, a person who is engaged in providing either clearing services or forwarding services alone can not be liable to pay service tax under sub-clause (j). This situation is upheld by the honorable CESTAT. In, MEDPRO PHARMA PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHENNAI reported in 2006 (3) S.T.R. 355 (Tri.-LB.),= [2006-TMI-433-CESTAT,NEW DELHI] honorable tribunal has held that, "Context of use of the word 'and' between the words 'clearing' and 'forwarding' relevant for interpretation - Segregation of holistic concept of 'clearing and forwarding' into divisible activities not possible". Further, the honorable Supreme Court has differentiated between the word "OR" and the word "AND" in Ape Belliss India Ltd. v. UOI, 2001 2008 -TMI - 45935 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. In this matter, honorable Supreme Court has held that, "This is clear from the use of the word 'and'. If the intention of the trade notice was to treat the two types of alloy steels as stainless steel then it would have been made clear by using the word 'or' instead of the word 'and'. In the said view of the matter, we are of the opinion that if an alloy steel is known as stainless steel in the trade and also has more than 11% chromium in it then alone the same could be considered as stainless and not otherwise. In the instant case, assuming that the alloy steel imported by the appellant is known in the trade as stainless steel still since on an analysis it is found that the chromium content is less than 11%, the same could not have been classified as stainless steel for the purpose of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 because the second condition as to the content of the chromium is not satisfied". Therefore, before making a decision on taxability of a particular service, due case must be given to the word "And" used in between. Here is the list of services in which the word 'And' has been used: -
By: Surender Gupta - February 13, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||