Article Section | |||||||||||
Home Articles Service Tax SARAVANAKUMAR BALASUBRAMANIAN Experts This |
|||||||||||
LEVY OF KRISHI KALYAN CESS |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
LEVY OF KRISHI KALYAN CESS |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
ALL ABOUT KRISHI KALYAN CESS Basic Points
Cenvat Credit of KKC paid
Point of Taxation in case of Forward Charge
Point of taxation in case of Reverse charge mechanism
By: SARAVANAKUMAR BALASUBRAMANIAN - June 1, 2016
Discussions to this article
Welcome Shri Saravanakumar and J. Balasubramanian, Chartered Accountants to this forum.
Whether the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of All India Federation of Tax Practitioners Vs. Union of India [ 2007 (8) TMI 1 - Supreme Court ]wherein it was held that “a tax on a thing or goods can only be with reference to a taxable event” and the same contention was upheld again in the case of Association of Leasing & Financial Service Companies Vs. Union of India [2010 (20) STR 417 (SC) - 2010 (10) TMI 4 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ], wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that the taxable event under the Service tax law is the rendition of service; therefore the date of service alone determines the Rate
Sir in my view: It can be seen that Rule 7 overrides rule 3,4,8 and does not overrule Rule 5 of POT and therefore, Rule 5 is an independent rule and prevails over Rule 7. Further, the 3rd proviso so inserted in rule 7 by Notification No.21/2016 S.T dated 30.03.2015 deals with the situation when there is a change in the liability or extent of liability of a person required to pay tax as recipient of service. Such change could arise when there will be change in the rates of abatement, exemption etc., under reverse charge mechanism i.e. it will be a case when liability of a service recipient on existing taxable services which arises due to existing tax/cess got changed. Therefore, the benefit of 3rd proviso of rule 7 shall not be available to the service recipient in case of new levy(KKC). Further 2nd Explanations inserted by Notification No 10/2016-ST dated 1st March, 2016 in POT Rules 5- states" New levy or tax shall be payable on all cases other than specified above" Further As per Notification No 27/2016-ST dated 26th May, 2016 section and language used in notification is section 68(2) is like that the tax shall be paid as like as a service provider. Hence in my view POT for service receiver shall be only DATE OF PAYMENT in call cases.
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||