Article Section | ||||||||||||||
Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Pragya Rajpurohit Experts This |
||||||||||||||
Sample Management Representation Letter - GST Audit |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Sample Management Representation Letter - GST Audit |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
The main purpose of Management Representation Letter on various matters is to focus the management’s attention on those matters so that the management can specifically address those matters in more detail than would otherwise be the case. However the Auditor needs to understand the limitations of management representations as audit evidence. Getting a Management Representation Letter does not absolve the auditor of its responsibilities. He has to exercise professional care in conducting the audit. Given below is a sample Management Representation Letter for GST Audit. It is not intended to be a standard letter. Representations by management will vary from one entity to another and from one period to the next. Date To Auditor, Sub: Management Representation Letter This representation letter is provided in connection with your audit of the financial statements and attest function of GSTR 9C of _________Company for the year ended March 31, 2018 as required under the provisions of section 35(5) and section 44(2) of the Goods And Service Tax Act, 2017 (In short “GST Act”) read with rule 80(3) of the Goods and Service Tax Rules (In short “GST Rules, 2017”) We acknowledge our responsibility for the fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with (indicate applicable financial reporting framework). We confirm, to the best of our knowledge and belief, the following representations:
Branch wise attested trail balance is provided in Annexure I
For ……..
By: Pragya Rajpurohit - June 12, 2019
Discussions to this article
Letter is comprehensive and convey the message properly. Very useful for all. Para No.11 (C) of the above letter Regarding the payment of interest, "it is legally and logically incorrect to pay interest on net liability. An assessee may have crores of Rupees in its Electronic Ledger Account, until and unless liability is debited from the account to the Govt. account, it cannot be said that tax has been paid.Without debit, ITC is lying in the account of the assessee and that ITC belongs to assessee and not to Govt.
If Shri Sethi is correct and justifiable then I request to provide the way to withdraw the amount of challan which an assessee had wrongly deposit due overlook without approaching to Govt.. In my opinion such an assessee has to go to the Govt. and submit request with all relevant documents and satisfy/prove them that the assessee is eligible for refund. This clearly indicates that there is no control of the assessee on such amount instead the entire amount is in control of Govt. Then how we can interpret that the amount is belongs to assesse.
Dear Sir, I have regards for your views. Now ball is in Supreme Court. It is my hunch that the issue is most likely to be decided in favour of the Department. I have examined this issue deeply and thoroughly.
The tax charged on outward tax invoice is to be paid to the government by 20th of subsequent month. If the consideration is received from the customer in the same month then the taxpayer get that tax money to use till the same is deposited to the exchequer. If the consideration from the customer is received after two months as per the agreed credit terms then the supplier has to be pay the tax from his pocket. On the other side if taxpayer buys goods from the supplier and has two months credit period to settle the bills then he is benefitted of the input tax credit without making payment to his supplier.
Government is also asking interest on gross liability even though there is balance in electronic ledger. In case a person is having credit card and saving account in the same bank and if there is outstanding amount to be paid and the delay happens then the interest is charged. Even though there is balance in saving account the interest is charged on default credit card payment.
There is chance that account holder may use the money in saving account to meet other need. So both saving and credit card account is considered separately. There is logic. If one says that amount in credit ledger belongs to the taxpayer and he can only offset against the liability in electronic liability ledger then it seems logical for the government to ask interest on gross tax and not on net .
Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani Ji, Regarding interest on net cash liability/gross amount, full relief has not been granted by Govt. in the Budget, 2019. Still interest is to be charged on gross amount, if SCN is issued under Sections 73 and 74 to the defaulter. This is a well planned strategy by Govt. Major interest is recovered through SCNs issued under Sections 73 and 74 of CGST Act. It is just like that if you pay bill of electricity or telephone, no surcharge (late fee here interest ) is payable. Anyhow it is incentive for not delaying Govt. dues.
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||