9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment involves three main issues: 1. Capitalization of expenditure related to site and portal development, 2. Disallowance of interest expenses for making advances to a director, and 3. Disallowance of interest under section 14A in relation to investment in shares/mutual funds yielding exempt dividend income. Capitalization of Expenditure Related to Site and Portal Development: The first issue pertains to the deletion of an addition of Rs. 38,47,939 made by the Assessing Officer on account of capitalization of expenditure related to site and portal development. The Assessing Officer considered the expenditure to be capital in nature due to the enduring advantage acquired by the assessee through the development of the site and portal. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the expenditure was incurred for earning revenue and was thus revenue in nature. The Tribunal upheld this decision, citing precedents and principles that support the view that expenditure incurred in connection with existing business activities is revenue expenditure. Disallowance of Interest Expenses for Making Advances to a Director: The second issue involves the disallowance of interest expenses amounting to Rs. 83,42,846 made by the Assessing Officer in relation to advances made to a director. The Assessing Officer alleged that the reclassification of fixed assets into advances was done with a mala fide intention to evade tax. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the claim, stating that the investment in the property was made out of interest-free funds raised by an earlier company. The Tribunal agreed with this reasoning, emphasizing that there was no evidence to suggest that interest-bearing funds were used for interest-free advances, and thus dismissed the Revenue's ground. Disallowance of Interest under Section 14A: The final issue concerns the disallowance of interest under section 14A in respect of investment in shares/mutual funds yielding exempt dividend income. The Assessing Officer disallowed a proportionate amount of interest, but the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) deleted the addition, noting that the investment in shares was made out of interest-free funds. The Tribunal concurred with this decision, highlighting the retrospective applicability of Rule 8D and the need for a direct nexus between investment in exempted income and interest-free capital. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's ground, stating that no justification was found for disallowance under section 14A. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on July 24, 2009.
|
