9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Validity of canceling Commissioner of Income-tax's order under section 263 by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. 2. Assessment of income arising from property received on partition by the assessee as the income of the Hindu undivided family. Analysis: The case involved applications under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, requesting the Tribunal to state the case and refer two legal questions for the court's opinion. The questions pertained to the cancellation of the Commissioner of Income-tax's order under section 263 and the assessment of income from property received on partition as the income of the Hindu undivided family. The applications arose from a common order of the Tribunal for different assessment years and were heard together. The undisputed factual background included a partial partition of a larger Hindu undivided family, resulting in the allocation of property to smaller Hindu undivided families. Assessments were made based on the income derived from the partitioned assets. The Commissioner of Income-tax, in a revisional jurisdiction under section 263, set aside the assessment order for one of the smaller Hindu undivided families, directing the inclusion of the income in the individual income of the family head. The Tribunal later set aside the Commissioner's order, leading to an application for reference under section 256(1) being rejected by the Tribunal. The Supreme Court's interpretation of similar provisions highlighted that once a partition order is recognized under the Income-tax Act, the family ceases to be assessed as a Hindu undivided family unless the order is set aside. Therefore, the Commissioner could not disregard the partition order and add income from the larger Hindu undivided family to the individual's income. Consequently, the Tribunal correctly held that the Commissioner's order under section 263 was not sustainable, leading to the rejection of the reference application under section 256(1) as no legal question arose from the Tribunal's decision. In conclusion, the applications were dismissed, and the rule was discharged with no order as to costs. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, emphasizing the significance of recognizing partition orders under the Income-tax Act and the limitations on revising such assessments.
|
