2012 (8) TMI 225 - AT - Income Tax

Dis allowance of Peripheral Development Expenses - CIT(A)allowed partial relief - Held that - As suggested by the Committee being a Government Body the ITAT Cuttack Bench in assessee s own case for AYs 1999-2000 and 2002-03 has held such expenditures allowable u/s.37 as revenue in nature by placing reliance on various judicial pronouncements on the issue. The learned CIT-DR could not bring any decision contrary to the above. Therefore the facts and issue being the same in the present Assessment Year the expenditure claimed under the head Peripheral Development Expenses is allowable u/s.37 - in favour of assessee. Computation of deduction u/s.80HHC - Non inclusion of sales tax and Excise Duty while arriving at total turnover by assessee - Held that - Direction to exclude Excise duty and Sales tax from the total turnover for the purpose of deduction of Section 80HHC as decided on in the case of CIT v. Lakshmi Machine Works 2007 (4) TMI 202 - SUPREME COURT that excise duty and sales tax were includible in the total turnover which was the denominator in the formula contained in section 80HHC(3) as it stood in the material time - against revenue. Deduction of 90% of the entire incomes credited to the P 76 lakhs as Misc. Expenses when the AO sought to disallow part of the expenses not pertaining to the business which the learned CIT(A) reduced heavily - to put a bar on such practice a token disallowance has been made by the CIT(A) - against assessee. Disallowance of the loss claimed on revaluation of non- moving stores & spares - CIT deleted it - Held that - If an item is lying in the inventory either unsold or unutilised if there is a change in the intrinsic value an assessee can revalue such assets and claim the loss on account of revaluation as a charge against profits as decided in vs. CIT 1953 (10) TMI 2 - SUPREME COURT - in favour of assessee. Dis allowance of addition of payment under benevolent Scheme - CIT deleted it - Held that - Deleted by ITAT Cuttack Bench in assessee s own case for the AYs 1993-94 to 1998-99 & 2000-01. thus follow the same - decided in favour of assessee. Addition being donation made to Sports Authority of India - Held that - Following the CIT case decided of Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd 1978 (4) TMI 75 - DELHI HIGH COURT CIT(A) has deleted the impugned addition in concluding that the payment to Sports Authority of India is not in the nature of donation but in the nature of advertisement and publicity which is an allowable expenditure - Whenever newspaper coverage or radio or TV coverage took place the name of assessee would be mentioned as one of the sponsors thus the expenditure is therefore clearly for the enhancement of the brand value and image of the company.

Issues Involved:

1. Peripheral Development Expenses
2. Deduction under Section 80HHC of the IT Act
3. Disallowance under Miscellaneous Expenses (Interest on land compensation)
4. Additional Depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) of the IT Act
5. Disallowance under Prior Period Adjustments
6. Disallowance under Other Miscellaneous Expenses
7. Disallowance of liability towards post-retirement medical benefits
8. Disallowance of loss on revaluation of non-moving stores & spares
9. Disallowance under Benevolent Scheme
10. Disallowance of Pot Relining Expenses
11. Disallowance of Expenditure on Debentures
12. Disallowance of Donation to Sports Authority of India

Detailed Analysis:

1. Peripheral Development Expenses:
The assessee claimed Rs. 3,89,43,807 under various heads as "Peripheral Development Expenses." The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 3,70,67,473, but the CIT(A) allowed partial relief. The ITAT, Cuttack, in line with previous decisions, held the expenditure allowable under Section 37 of the IT Act and directed deletion of the addition.

2. Deduction under Section 80HHC of the IT Act:
The Assessing Officer included sales tax and excise duty in the total turnover and deducted 90% of other incomes credited to the P&L account. The CIT(A) directed exclusion of sales tax and excise duty from the total turnover but upheld the deduction of 90% of the entire other incomes. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the issue in light of relevant judicial pronouncements.

3. Disallowance under Miscellaneous Expenses (Interest on land compensation):
The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 5,43,804 as interest on land compensation, considering it capital expenditure. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A), stating that interest on delayed compensation cannot be allowed as revenue expenditure.

4. Additional Depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) of the IT Act:
The assessee claimed additional depreciation of Rs. 29,84,93,282 on plants and machinery installed in a new unit. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim due to the lack of details. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance. The ITAT restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, directing to allow additional depreciation on plant and machinery acquired and installed after 1.4.2002.

5. Disallowance under Prior Period Adjustments:
The assessee claimed Rs. 14,42,083 as helicopter hire charges. The CIT(A) disallowed it, stating that it should have been claimed in the year of approval. The ITAT disagreed, allowing the expenditure in the assessment year under consideration since the bill was received during that year.

6. Disallowance under Other Miscellaneous Expenses:
The Assessing Officer disallowed 20% of Rs. 76,62,680 under "Other expenses." The CIT(A) reduced the disallowance to Rs. 3,00,000. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s token disallowance, emphasizing the need for detailed accounting.

7. Disallowance of liability towards post-retirement medical benefits:
The assessee did not press this ground, and the ITAT dismissed it as not pressed.

8. Disallowance of loss on revaluation of non-moving stores & spares:
The CIT(A) allowed the loss of Rs. 3,28,37,525, following the ITAT's previous decisions. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding no substantial questions of fact and law involved.

9. Disallowance under Benevolent Scheme:
The CIT(A) allowed Rs. 21,62,380 paid to families of deceased employees, following ITAT's previous decisions. The ITAT upheld this decision, finding no contrary material from the Revenue.

10. Disallowance of Pot Relining Expenses:
The CIT(A) allowed Rs. 12,48,65,553 as revenue expenditure, following ITAT's previous decisions. The ITAT upheld this decision, finding no contrary material from the Revenue.

11. Disallowance of Expenditure on Debentures:
The CIT(A) allowed Rs. 45,41,068 as revenue expenditure, following ITAT's previous decisions. The ITAT upheld this decision, finding no contrary material from the Revenue.

12. Disallowance of Donation to Sports Authority of India:
The CIT(A) allowed Rs. 85,00,000 paid to the Sports Authority of India as an advertisement expense, following the Delhi High Court's decision in CIT Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. The ITAT upheld this decision, finding no contrary material from the Revenue.

Conclusion:
The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, while the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.

← Previous Next →