Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2013 (2) TMI 627 - SCH - Income TaxDeduction u/s 37(1) - welfare expenses towards providing education to its employees children & Payments to other educational institutions where the children of its employees were studying - held that - matter remanded back in view of earlier decision in Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income-tax 2012 (9) TMI 765 - SUPREME COURT . There is a difference between reim-bursement and contribution. If the Tribunal comes to the conclusion that the amount has been reimbursed the quantified amount shall be certified by the chartered accountant of the assessee to enable the assessee to make a claim.
The Supreme Court of India remitted a civil appeal concerning the assessment year 1994-95 to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for de-novo consideration. The court emphasized the difference between reimbursement and contribution, instructing the quantified amount to be certified by the assessee's chartered accountant for making a claim. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of with no costs.
|