9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (5) TMI 555 - AT - Income TaxUndisclosed income out of suppression of closing stock - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that - Addition was deleted by CIT(A) on this basis that this amount of closing stock as on 31.03.1999 cannot be added separately because this is appearing as opening stock as on 01.04.1999 and it has been considered for working out amount of sales from 1.4.99 to the date of search and addition on this aspect of Rs.27.58 lacs was duly confirmed by him and, therefore, no separate addition on account of this difference in value of stock is called for - no interference is called for in the order of CIT(A) - Against revenue. Unexplained expenses claimed - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that - Addition was deleted by CIT(A) on this basis that the assessee deserves the benefit of the telescoping against addition confirmed by CIT(A) of Rs.30.90 lacs. Under these facts no interference is called for in the order of CIT(A) on this issue also. Accordingly, ground No.2 of the revenue is also rejected. Against revenue.
Issues:
Cross appeals by assessee and revenue for block period; Dismissal of assessee's appeal for non-prosecution; Deletion of addition on account of undisclosed income from suppression of closing stock; Deletion of addition miscellaneous application of unexplained expenses claimed by assessee. Issue 1: Dismissal of Assessee's Appeal for Non-Prosecution The Appellate Tribunal noted that despite notice and adjournment application, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee. Citing precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that filing an appeal is not enough; it must be effectively pursued. Referring to previous cases, the Tribunal highlighted that failure to prosecute an appeal can lead to dismissal. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was dismissed for want of prosecution. Issue 2: Deletion of Addition on Account of Undisclosed Income from Suppression of Closing Stock Regarding the addition on account of undisclosed income from suppression of closing stock, the CIT(A) had deleted the addition of Rs.27,58,899. The Tribunal examined the CIT(A)'s reasoning, which highlighted that the closing stock as of 31.03.1999 was considered as the opening stock on 01.04.1999. As this amount was already factored into the sales calculation, no separate addition was warranted. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A)'s decision and rejected Ground No.1 of the revenue's appeal. Issue 3: Deletion of Addition of Unexplained Expenses Claimed by Assessee In the case of the addition of unexplained expenses claimed by the assessee, the CIT(A) had deleted the addition of Rs.4,03,050. The Tribunal reviewed the CIT(A)'s rationale, which linked the source of expenditure to the undisclosed income available with the appellant. As a result, the addition was deemed unnecessary due to the telescoping effect against the confirmed addition. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision and rejected Ground No.2 of the revenue's appeal. In conclusion, both the assessee's and the revenue's appeals were dismissed, with the Tribunal affirming the CIT(A)'s decisions on the issues discussed. The judgment highlighted the importance of actively pursuing appeals and provided detailed reasoning for the deletion of additions related to undisclosed income and unexplained expenses.
|
