2013 (6) TMI 241 - AT - Central Excise

Eligibility for cenvat credit - welding electrodes and H.R. Plates used for repair and maintenance of the plant and machinery - Held that - As decided in Ambuja Cements (2010 (4) TMI 429 - CHHAITISGARH HIGH COURT), Hindustan Zinc Ltd. (2008 (7) TMI 55 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN) and Alfred Herbert (India) Ltd. (2010 (4) TMI 424 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT) welding electrodes other items used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery would be eligible for cenvat credit. Also decided in Singh Alloys & Steel Ltd. case (1993 (1) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA) that for determining the question as to whether an input is eligible for cenvat credit what is relevant is whether its use is commercially expedient and what ought to be used is not relevant. Since with defective machinery, leaking pipes and tubes and leaking tanks manufacturing operations are not commercially possible and regular repair and maintenance is an essential activity for smooth manufacturing operation, the inputs used for repair and maintenance of the plant and machinery would be eligible cenvat credit. In favour of assessee.

Issues:
Eligibility for cenvat credit in respect of welding electrodes, DA gas, Tandem de White Metal, and Tin solders used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery.

Issue Analysis:

1. Eligibility for Cenvat Credit:
The appellant, a manufacturer of sugar chargeable to central excise duty, appealed against the denial of cenvat credit for welding electrodes, DA gas, Tandem de White Metal, and Tin solders used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery. Two different orders by the Assistant Commissioner held these items not eligible for credit, leading to a disputed amount. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Assistant Commissioner's decision, prompting the filing of appeals. The appellant argued citing judgments from various High Courts favoring eligibility for cenvat credit in similar cases. The Department defended the impugned order, referring to a judgment where repair and maintenance were deemed distinct from manufacture. The Tribunal noted conflicting judgments from different High Courts on the issue. Despite one High Court ruling against cenvat credit for repair and maintenance items, the Tribunal emphasized the nexus with manufacturing activity as crucial for determining eligibility. Citing a Calcutta High Court case, the Tribunal highlighted that the commercial expediency of using such items is significant. The Tribunal ultimately set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals and granting eligibility for cenvat credit for the items used in repair and maintenance activities.

2. Relevance of High Court Judgments:
The Tribunal acknowledged the conflicting views of various High Courts on the eligibility of items used for repair and maintenance activities for cenvat credit. While one High Court considered repair and maintenance distinct from manufacturing, others emphasized the nexus with manufacturing activity as crucial for determining eligibility for cenvat credit. The Tribunal aligned with the view that commercial expediency and the necessity of using such items for smooth manufacturing operations are pivotal in deciding eligibility for cenvat credit. By considering the practical implications and the essential nature of repair and maintenance activities in manufacturing operations, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, granting cenvat credit for the disputed items.

3. Commercial Expediency and Nexus with Manufacturing:
The Tribunal emphasized the commercial expediency of using items for repair and maintenance to ensure smooth manufacturing operations. Citing a Calcutta High Court case, the Tribunal highlighted that the necessity of using such items for maintaining machinery and ensuring continuous manufacturing operations is crucial for determining eligibility for cenvat credit. By focusing on the practical aspects and the necessity of repair and maintenance activities for manufacturing processes, the Tribunal concluded that the disputed items used for such activities are indeed eligible for cenvat credit. This approach underscores the importance of maintaining operational efficiency and the seamless functioning of manufacturing units, justifying the allowance of cenvat credit for items essential for repair and maintenance purposes.

4. Decision and Legal Basis:
The Tribunal, after considering submissions from both parties and reviewing the relevant legal precedents, concluded that the items used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery are eligible for cenvat credit. By emphasizing the nexus of these items with manufacturing activities and the commercial expediency of using them for ensuring smooth operations, the Tribunal overturned the impugned orders and allowed the appeals. This decision aligns with the practical requirements of manufacturing units, recognizing the essential role of repair and maintenance activities in sustaining manufacturing operations. The legal basis for granting cenvat credit in this case rests on the commercial necessity and operational significance of the disputed items, highlighting their crucial role in maintaining manufacturing efficiency and productivity.

← Previous Next →