9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (8) TMI 327 - AT - Income TaxNotice u/s 148 - Reasons given for reassessment - CIT held reasons not sufficient and quashed reassessment proceedings - Held that - Assessee had given a detailed reply along with tariff order of CERC justifying the reversal. It was after considering all these aspects, that the original assessment order was passed by the Assessing Officer - When specific queries were raised and detailed answers were given, it would be na ve to presume that Assessing Officer had not applied his mind - There was no new material with Assessing Officer for taking a view that claim of the assessee was incorrectly allowed. There was no new tangible material, for resorting to reopening - Following decision of DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/s NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LTD 2012 (8) TMI 190 - ITAT, CHENNAI - Decided against Revenue.
Issues:
1. Disallowance of Rs. 301.5 Crores relating to sales adjustment by the CIT(Appeals). 2. Validity of reassessment proceedings challenged by the assessee. Analysis: Issue 1: Disallowance of Rs. 301.5 Crores The Revenue appealed against the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 301.5 Crores by the CIT(Appeals) related to sales adjustment due to the revision of power tariff by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC). The Revenue contended that the assessee did not disclose all material facts fully and truly, leading to income escaping assessment. The Assessing Officer sought to reopen the assessment under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on the alleged non-disclosure. The CIT(Appeals) found that the original assessment had considered all relevant aspects, including the reversal of sales based on CERC tariff determination. The CIT(Appeals) deemed the reopening invalid, as it appeared to be a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal concurred, stating that there was no new material for the reassessment and upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Issue 2: Validity of Reassessment Proceedings The assessee challenged the validity of the reassessment, arguing that the reasons given were not valid. During the original assessment, the Assessing Officer had requested details regarding the sales reversal of Rs. 301.5 Crores based on CERC tariff. The assessee provided a comprehensive reply, including documentation of the CERC order and Ministry of Coal guidelines. The CIT(Appeals) noted that the Assessing Officer had allowed the claim initially after considering all information. The CIT(Appeals) held that the reopening was an attempt to change the original view and declared it invalid. The Tribunal agreed, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer had lawfully considered the claim previously, and there was no new material to support the reassessment. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(Appeals) decision regarding the disallowance of Rs. 301.5 Crores and the invalidity of the reassessment proceedings. The Tribunal found that the original assessment had adequately addressed the sales adjustment issue, and the reassessment lacked sufficient grounds, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.
|
