Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2013 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (11) TMI 739 - HC - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Admissibility of deduction under Section 80HH and 80I of the Income Tax Act on interest received from debtors/customers on delayed payments.
2. Whether the interest received is considered income derived from the industrial undertaking.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Admissibility of Deduction under Section 80HH and 80I:

The core issue is whether the interest received from debtors/customers on delayed payments qualifies for deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I of the Income Tax Act. The appellant department contended that such interest does not constitute income derived from an industrial undertaking and hence is not eligible for the deductions. They argued that the Assessing Officer rightly excluded the interest income from the deductions, while the CIT(A) and ITAT erred in allowing it.

The respondent assessee argued that the interest received from delayed payments is part of the sale consideration and thus income derived from the industrial undertaking. They cited various judgments to support their claim that such interest qualifies for deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I.

2. Income Derived from Industrial Undertaking:

The court examined whether the interest received on delayed payments is income derived from the industrial undertaking. The CIT(A) and ITAT had concluded that the interest income is indeed part of the business income derived from the industrial undertaking. The CIT(A) specifically noted that the interest was received from customers in the course of business for amounts outstanding on account of credit sales, making it an integral part of the business income.

Findings:

The court analyzed several precedents to determine the nature of interest income:

- CIT v. Govinda Choudhury & Sons: The Supreme Court held that interest on delayed payments is attributable and incidental to the business and should be treated as business income.
- CIT v. Poddar Pigments Ltd.: The Delhi High Court ruled that interest on delayed payments is part of the sale price and thus derived from the business of the industrial undertaking.
- CIT v. Jackson Engineers Ltd.: The Delhi High Court held that interest from customers on delayed payments is part of the sale consideration and income derived from the business.
- CIT v. Advance Detergents Ltd.: The Delhi High Court reiterated that interest on delayed payments from customers is part of the business income.
- Phatela Cotgin Industries (P) Ltd. v. CIT: The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that interest on delayed payments is income derived from the industrial undertaking.
- Tata Sponge Iron Ltd. v. CIT: The Orissa High Court concluded that interest earned from customers for delayed payments is income derived from the industrial undertaking.
- CIT v. Indo Matsushita Carbon Co. Ltd.: The Madras High Court held that interest received from trade debtors on overdue payments is eligible for deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I.
- Nirma Industries Ltd. v. DCIT: The Gujarat High Court held that interest on delayed payments is part of the sale consideration and income derived from the business.

The court found that the interest received by the respondent assessee from trade debtors on outstanding balances is an inseparable part of the contract of sale. Hence, it forms part of the income derived from the industrial undertaking and is eligible for deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I.

Conclusion:

The court agreed with the findings of the CIT(A) and ITAT, holding that the interest received from customers on delayed payments is part of the income derived from the industrial undertaking. Consequently, it is eligible for deductions under Sections 80HH and 80I of the Income Tax Act. The appeal by the appellant department was dismissed, and the order of the ITAT was upheld.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates