Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2014 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (10) TMI 262 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Interpretation of interest under Section 234D of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Granting of interest under Section 244A(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
1. The judgment dealt with the Appeal arising from an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning the Assessment Year 2002-2003. The first issue revolved around whether interest under Section 234D should be charged. The counsel for the Revenue argued that the Tribunal erred in not levying the interest. However, it was noted that a previous judgment by the Court had ruled against the Assessee on a similar matter. Consequently, the Court partially allowed the Appeal, ruling in favor of the Revenue on this issue.

2. The second issue involved the grant of interest under Section 244A(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court examined the provisions of Section 244A and the Tribunal's order. The Respondent cited a judgment by the Delhi High Court, which was based on a decision by the Madras High Court. The Tribunal had relied on these views to dismiss the Revenue's Appeal. The counsel for the Revenue acknowledged that the issue was settled against them, as the statutory provision was identical at the relevant time. Therefore, the Court dismissed the Appeal on this issue, in line with the legal position established by the previous judgments.

Overall, the Court partially allowed the Appeal concerning the charging of interest under Section 234D, favoring the Revenue. However, the Appeal was dismissed regarding the grant of interest under Section 244A(1)(b), as the legal position established by previous judgments was against the Revenue. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the legal provisions and precedents, leading to a clear decision on each issue raised in the case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates