Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2019 (3) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (3) TMI 1407 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Admissibility of the Application
2. Classification of the Products as Medicaments or Food Supplements
3. Submissions of the Applicant
4. Submissions of the Revenue
5. Observations and Findings of the Authority

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Admissibility of the Application:
The Applicant, a manufacturer of pharmaceuticals, seeks a ruling on the classification of fifteen products. The application is admissible under section 97(2)(a) of the GST Act, which allows for the classification of goods or services. The Applicant declares that the issue is not pending or decided in any other proceedings under the GST Act. Despite the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (WBAAAR) cautioning against accepting a single application for multiple products, the Applicant argues that the GST Act does not prohibit such applications. The Authority, however, decides to follow the instruction of the WBAAAR to limit the ruling to a single category of goods or services.

2. Classification of the Products as Medicaments or Food Supplements:
The products listed under Sl Nos. 2 to 13 are labeled as dietary/health supplements. The Applicant claims these products have therapeutic or prophylactic uses, are sold at pharmacies, and are prescribed by physicians. However, the Authority notes that the labels of these products specifically mention that they are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. According to Note 1(a) of Chapter 30, food supplements are excluded from being classified as medicaments under HSN 3004. Additionally, the Applicant has not shown any license for the manufacture and sale of these products as required under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

3. Submissions of the Applicant:
The Applicant argues that the products have therapeutic or prophylactic uses and are prescribed by medical practitioners. They refer to judicial pronouncements to support the classification based on how customers use the products, emphasizing the common parlance test. The Applicant concludes that the products should be classified under HSN 3004.

4. Submissions of the Revenue:
The concerned officer from the Revenue submits that the therapeutic or prophylactic use of the products needs to be ascertained from experts in the field of medicine and the Drug Control Authority. The officer also points out that some invoices classify the products under HSN 2106.

5. Observations and Findings of the Authority:
The Authority observes that classification should be based on the nature and character of the goods, focusing on their therapeutic or prophylactic uses. The products labeled as dietary/health supplements are not considered medicaments under HSN 3004. The labels and the lack of a manufacturing license for these products further support this conclusion. The products are classified under HSN 2106 as food preparations not elsewhere specified or included, and are taxable under Sl No. 23 of Schedule III of the Rate Notification.

RULING:
The Application is admitted for the classification of products labeled as dietary/health supplements. Products mentioned under Sl Nos. 2 to 13 are classified under HSN 2106 and are taxable under Sl No. 23 of Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28/06/2017, as amended. This ruling is valid subject to the provisions under Section 103 until declared void under Section 104(1) of the GST Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates