9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (3) TMI 1201 - AT - Income TaxDisallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - payment of shipment expenses - Amount paid or payable during the year under consideration - HELD THAT - Provision of section 40(a)(ia) would cover not only to the amounts which are payable as on 31st March of a particular year but also which are payable at any time during the year. Therefore, respectfully following the discussions made, analysis done and the judgment passed by Hon ble ITAT, Lucknow Bench-B in the case of Ama Medical Diagnostic Centre 2014 (5) TMI 931 - ITAT LUCKNOW it is held that the assessee was required to deduct TDS on the full amount paid or payable during the year under consideration. Since, the same has not been done, which is an admitted fact by the appellant during the appellate proceedings, therefore, in my considered opinion, the A.O. has rightly made the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act. Accordingly, the action of the A.O. is upheld. - Decided against assessee
Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. 2. Applicability of TDS on payments made during the year. 3. Jurisdictional interpretation of Section 40(a)(ia) by different High Courts. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act: The core issue in this case revolves around the disallowance of ?18.55 lacs under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) noticed that the assessee made payments amounting to ?61.85 lacs to M/s. Rising Overseas without deducting tax at source (TDS). Consequently, the AO disallowed 30% of these expenses, leading to an addition of ?18,55,500/-. The assessee's objection to this disallowance was not accepted by the AO, and the CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision. 2. Applicability of TDS on Payments Made During the Year: The CIT(A) examined whether the provision of Section 40(a)(ia) applies to amounts paid during the year or only to amounts payable at the end of the year. The CIT(A) relied on various judicial pronouncements and a circular from the CBDT dated 16/12/2013, which clarified that the term "payable" includes amounts paid during the year. The CIT(A) referred to the judgments of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court and Hon’ble Calcutta High Court, which held that Section 40(a)(ia) covers amounts payable at any time during the year, not just at the end of the year. 3. Jurisdictional Interpretation of Section 40(a)(ia) by Different High Courts: The CIT(A) and the ITAT discussed the conflicting interpretations of Section 40(a)(ia) by different High Courts. The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, in the case of Vector Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd., suggested that disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) applies only to amounts payable at the end of the year. However, the ITAT noted that this interpretation was not the main thrust of the argument before the High Court and was merely a passing reference. The ITAT emphasized that the Hon’ble Gujarat and Calcutta High Courts had dealt with the issue in detail and held that Section 40(a)(ia) applies to amounts payable at any time during the year. The ITAT also referred to a CBDT circular which supported this broader interpretation. The ITAT concluded that the ratio laid down by the Special Bench in the case of Merilyn Shipping & Transports, which was relied upon by the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court, had been overruled by other High Courts. Consequently, the ITAT held that the provision of Section 40(a)(ia) covers amounts payable at any time during the year, and the assessee was required to deduct TDS on the full amount paid or payable during the year. Final Judgment: The ITAT upheld the findings of the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee. The ITAT found no error or infirmity in the CIT(A)'s decision to uphold the disallowance of ?18.55 lacs under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The order was pronounced in the open court on 13.03.2020.
|
